User talk:Siddeo11

September 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Asuka (wrestler) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Asuka (wrestler) was changed by Siddeo11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885738 on 2017-09-07T14:40:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm JudeccaXIII. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Seth Rollins, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JudeccaXIII (talk) 04:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Seth Rollins. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 04:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Siddeo11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Dean Ambrose have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Siddeo11. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dave Bautista, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 04:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Charlotte Flair, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 06:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Becky Lynch and Seth Rollins, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 06:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Samoa Joe. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 16:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Corbin

Thank you for updating wrestling pages. Wikipedia has a policy called WP:V. All added content must have a reliable source, so it can be verified now and in the future. You can be blocked from editing if you do not cite (WP:CITE) sources that can support your additions. Not having them also severely brings down article quality. If you do not understand how, see WP: Referencing for beginners. A list of reliable and unreliable sources can be found at WP:PW/RS. If you do not start doing this, do not be shocked if you face community sanctions. StaticVapor message me! 05:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dolph Ziggler. StaticVapor message me! 17:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 00:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Braun Strowman. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 16:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 07:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bray Wyatt. StaticVapor message me! 00:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Wikipedia has a policy on verifiability<-----(click blue link). Please WP:CITE/WP: Referencing for beginners<----(click) a URL to a reliable source (notable website) to support what you are adding to articles about living people. If you do not start doing this you will be blocked from editing. You are also required to WP:ENGAGE with other editors. StaticVapor message me! 00:55, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kevin Owens, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 06:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Seth Rollins. StaticVapor message me! 02:22, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. N.J.A. | talk 10:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siddeo11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry if I violated any guidelines as it was purely unintentional. I request my unblocking per assurance of not committing any mistake hence forth.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siddeo11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I have been blocked for disruptive editing. I did not aim to do it and sincerely appeal for my unblocking on the assurance of not committing any mistake hence forth.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What mistakes did you make, and how will you correct them in the future? 331dot (talk) 22:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I made the mistake of not citing references. I will make sure this does not happen again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddeo11 (talk • contribs)

I've removed the unblock template from your reply. It is not necessary to use that template for every reply. SQL ^{Query me!} 15:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Siddeo11:, do you know how to cite a reference? Can you explain to me how to do it? And when you add content to any article, how often will you cite a reference? StaticVapor message me! 06:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know the WIKI markup method where ref tag are added at the start and end of a URL link. Then adding them in footnotes. I will try my best to cite accurate references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddeo11 (talk • contribs)

STOP IT. By continuing to create new unblock requests just to answer questions, you are demonstrating pretty clearly that you don't understand wiki markup and should not be unblocked. You've been warned about this already. Don't open a new unblock request again, not while you have an open request above. --Yamla (talk) 18:57, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You will also want to answer STATicVapor's question above ("when you add content to any article, how often will you cite a reference?") which you have so far not done. Or alternatively, if you are unwilling to answer the question or don't know the answer, please say so. Note this will count against your chances of being unblocked. Hint: you should already thoroughly understand WP:CITE, WP:RS, and WP:V and the answer is found there. --Yamla (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to cite accurate references almost everytime. Yes, I have been through the references provided earlier. -- Siddeo11 18:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siddeo11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request my unblocking per assurance I will try and cite accurate references via the WIKI markup method. Any violation of guidelines be forgiven and I intend on expanding Wikipedia with the utmost sincerity.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siddeo11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will try and cite accurate references via the WIKI markup method. Any violation of guidelines be forgiven and I intend on expanding Wikipedia with the utmost sincerity. I intend on expanding Wikipedia and disruptive editing was a mistake. This will not happen again.

Decline reason:

No response to NinjaRobotPirate's request below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please demonstrate for us here an example edit that you would like to make. For example, you can see in this edit I added some information about a classic video game and cited it to a reliable source. Just type out the edit you would make here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]