User talk:Sialthuong

Dead citations

Thank you for your recent interest in Wikipedia's Vietnam-related articles. Unfortunately, several of the sources you cited appear to have been written based on Wikipedia articles. Please avoid citing such sources, because circular references call into question the accuracy of Wikipedia and hinder further research. Also, some of the sources you replaced were either still online or have been archived at the Wayback Machine; a quick check would have preserved these citations. Finally, in case it is relevant to you, please be aware of Wikipedia's guidelines regarding conflict of interest. Thank you for understanding. – Minh Nguyễn ^💬 10:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sialthuong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I have done and I promise to make productive contribution.Sialthuong (talk) 07:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So, if unblocked, you will no longer attempt to create backlinks to your website? PhilKnight (talk) 10:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, I do understand what I have done look really look like spam. But I only intend to create a live citation. At the time of making those change, I didn't know that WaybackMachine can be used as a citation source. So I re-written that content on our website and cited. I admit that I did think about backlink and SEO at that time, but I also want to make those article better, and did not want visitors lead to 404 page when they need to verify information on that page. Next time I will use Way Back Machine or other kind of Internet Archive to cite.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sialthuong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I will never create a link back to my website from Wikipedia. I will use Wayback Machine Instead and try to make Wikipedia better with my knowledge.

Decline reason:

On reflection, I think a standard offer approach could be taken. In this context, I suggest you make a new unblock request in 6 months time. PhilKnight (talk) 15:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Callanecc:- would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 18:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One question for Sialtuong, were you following the advice of Matthew Woodward? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc:- Hi, No. Actually I got the idea from Backlinko, a really good guy at SEO and links building, that's why I thought what I have done is legit (but it's not). I haven't read any kind of complete guide about it like Matthew's. For me, I think Matthew's work is some kind of gray or even black hat SEO, which I don't believe in. SialThuong (talk) 00:40, 25 January 2015 (GMT +7)

Sorry Phil: I don't have an objection to unblock per se. But I'd suggest that they're edits will be very closely watched and anything smelling like link spamming will very likely result in an indef block. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buffalo Tours (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Buffalo Tours and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sialthuong, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SEO Suggestion

I noticed you work in SEO and are trying to improve something based on some advice you read on the Internet. While you are blocked, I invite you to read Wikipedia:Search engine optimization, as it is one of the most accurate ways to deal with SEO on Wikipedia. --w^L^{<speak·check>} 03:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Buffalo Tours concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Buffalo Tours, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Buffalo Tours

Hello, Sialthuong. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Buffalo Tours".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rich^T|C|E-Mail 20:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]