User talk:Shturmavik71

Shturmavik71, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shturmavik71! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The website independentsciencenews.org is not a reliable source, much less a WP:MEDRS. At Mòjiāng virus, you've disputed that WP:MEDRS applies, but there has been a broad understanding that scientific claims about SARS-CoV-2 and CoVID-19 are to be held to a very high standard of sourcing. The independentsciencenews.org article you've added to Mòjiāng virus (diff) and cited at Talk:Wuhan Institute of Virology (diff) promotes the idea that SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a laboratory, which is a WP:FRINGE view. Medium blogs (such as the one you cited at Talk:Wuhan Institute of Virology: diff) are also not reliable sources for claims about the origins of SARS-CoV-2. Please stop using or promoting the use of these sorts of sources in CoVID-19-related articles. -Thucydides411 (talk) 10:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The edits I've made are not WP:FRINGE, please take a look at WP:FRINGENOT Shturmavik71 (talk) 10:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to escalate this issue, because the promotion of SARS-CoV-2 conspiracy theories and the use of conspiracy-theory websites and Medium posts as sources is not acceptable on Wikipedia. I am confident that the community will back me up on that. I'm giving you a chance to self-revert and stop inserting this material before I do so. -Thucydides411 (talk) 17:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As i said in the talk page, I've replaced the original source with a peer-reviewed paper. right now the sources backing my edit are "The Times" , "ScienceMag"X2 , and a published and peer reviewed paper.

Please do escalate, you will have to exaplain why you keep reverting the page to a state that clealry misreprents the facts, because your protecting wikipedia due to your definition of what a conspiracy theory is.Shturmavik71 (talk) 18:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding content irrelevant to Mòjiāng virus at Mòjiāng virus. Henipa (talk) 19:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting content without addressing it in the talk page

DRN

Do you wish to make a statement at DRN? If you do not make a statement, I will close the case. It may repeat what you have already said. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discertionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]