User talk:Shr19

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Shr19, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Doctor^G (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visionscape (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deli nk was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Visionscape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deli nk (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visionscape (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dlohcierekim was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Visionscape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 17:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adeniyi Makanjuola (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Galobtter was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I do not see the coverage of him needed. That forbes article appears to be a contributor one - so not considered for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Galobtter (talkó tuó mió) 17:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Visionscape

Hello Shr19,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Visionscape for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship to Visionscape

I see that you have declared a conflict of interest with regard to the topic of Visionscape. Could you please tell us about your relationship with this company? Are you employed by them, or paid to represent them in some capacity? Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had developed a website for this company few years ago, I m not paid for adding this article on Wikipedia, its totally third party point of view. I m new to Wikipedia so i have made odd mistakes, but this page now follows the Wiki policies and i believe it should be approved now. Again I'm not employed or paid by Visionscape. (Shr19 (talk) 16:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC))[reply]

I wouldn't say that you are a completely disinterested third party, since you had a previous business relationship with the company. However, if you are not being paid by them at the present time, then the paid editing rules won't apply to you. Your existing COI declaration is satisfactory - thank you for clarifying your position. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Pls do let me know if you require any more info.. also i would like to ask if you think this page is good enough to go live? (Shr19 (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC))[reply]

If you're referring to Visionscape, it's currently up for speedy deletion for the reasons of unambiguous advertising or promotion. Whether it gets deleted or not, I can't say... I will leave it up to the reviewing administrator. In my opinion, the outlook is not good and the problem lies with your sources. Forbes is often challenged as an unreliable source, because its blog posts from contributing authors are not subject to fact-checking or editorial oversight. Likewise, PR Newswire is a site for press releases. Company-authored material is a self-published source and therefore not reliable, because it lacks the required independence from the subject.

You can leave questions about sources and their reliability at the reliable sources noticeboard. Many experienced editors there can help with finding and evaluating sources for an article. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:45, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 00:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen your COI statement but your efforts and the fact that this is all that you have done leads me to think that this is a promotional push and your goals are not compatible with ours at the present. Your edits are promotional.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adeniyi Makanjuola (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 04:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola

Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Adeniyi Makanjuola during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]