User talk:Shoshui

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Compositions by Bhumibol Adulyadej, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages A Love Story, Smiles and When. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for suggestion, I will remove the unintended or irrelevant links, as soon as possible, sorry for my bad English. Shoshui Shoshui 20:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC+7)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Thai clothing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khmer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franco-Thai War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaya. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

I see by your edit to History of Thailand that you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Ayutthaya Kingdom

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.ayutthaya-history.com/Temples_Ruins_Introduction.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for suggestion, I will leave a message on your talk page, if I don't understand the copyright policy. sorry for my bad English. Shoshui Shoshui 15:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC+7)

References

Your changes to Thailand in World War II make quite a number of claims that must be referenced by reliable sources. If you need help with doing this let me know and I will try to be of assistance.NealeFamily (talk) 01:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from School uniforms by country into Traditional Thai clothing. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Ayutthaya Kingdom has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators may be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 12:51, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image sizes

Hi. Please avoid specifying image sizes in pixels, per MOS:IMGSIZE. In most cases, the image size should not be specified at all, so that the user's default preferences may be followed. For upright images, simply add |upright to the image code. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:First Chinese domination of Vietnam.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:First Chinese domination of Vietnam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shoshui. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thailand in World War II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orthographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese air attacks on Thailand

Hi Shoshui

I noted you deleted all references to Japanese air attacks on Thailand, with the comment that they didn't bomb Bangkok on one of the deletions. They did attack mount air attacks on Thailand as part of the initial invasion - is the information below incorrect?

Military targets at and near Bangkok were first attacked by 3rd Air Group's (第三航空隊) Mitsubishi Ki-30s of the 31st Sentai under Lt Col Hayashi Junji as part of the Japanese invasion of Thailand. Prior to the start of the invasion, fighters from the 77th Sentai and bombers of the 31st Sentai moved to Siem Reap close to the Thai border. On the morning of 8 December 1941, they were ordered to attack Aranyaprathet airfield on their way to Bangkok. Nine 31st Sentai bombers, escorted by 11 Nakajima Ki-27s of the 77th Sentai led by Japanese air ace Major Yoshio Hirose (広瀬吉雄), headed for the Thai capital. On their approach they were intercepted by three Thai Air Force Curtiss Hawk III fighters from 43 Squadron. These were flown by Flight Lieutenant Chin Chiramaneemai, Flight Lieutenant Chai Sunthornsing and Flying Officer Sarit Potivetchagul and were based at Watana Nakorn airfield in Prachinburi Province. They had been advised not to engage the superior aircraft, but they took off anyway as a matter of national pride. Major Hirose, Lieutenant Yoshiro Kuwabara and Lieutenant Tsuguo Kojima shot down all three planes, killing the Thai pilots. [1]

NealeFamily (talk) 01:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phibun Cabinet Conference.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phibun Cabinet Conference.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Compositions by Bhumibol Adulyadej

The article Compositions by Bhumibol Adulyadej has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's an unsourced list of dubious notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vmavanti (talk) 17:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]