Jump to content

User talk:ShonaNdebele Historian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi ShonaNdebele Historian! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 13:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:AmaShona-Ndebele 21st Century Relationship

[edit]

Hi. You have a sandbox to construct articles (or just experimenting). Wikipedia also offers a draft space for that purpose. Stand-alone talk-pages are not the way to do it and will get speedily deleted. Good luck and welcome. Kleuske (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bocha, Mutare District (September 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 19:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ShonaNdebele Historian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 19:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ruud Gwirambira per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ruud Gwirambira. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]

{{unblock|1=On what basis are you saying I’m Ruud Gwirambira [[User:ShonaNdebele Historian|ShonaNdebele Historian]] ([[User talk:ShonaNdebele Historian#top|talk]]) 16:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)}} [[User:ShonaNdebele Historian|ShonaNdebele Historian]] ([[User talk:ShonaNdebele Historian#top|talk]]) 16:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Unblock

[edit]

{{unblock|1=There is no way we can improve Wikipedia with this kind of behavior just blocking everyone indefinitely like this. I was politely asking for the reason behind removing edits on [[Budiriro]] by [[User:Ruud Gwirambira|Ruud Gwirambira]] so that we would have a consensus. If it's not properly cited then I would but you just blocked for asking you that. So I was supposed to edit in silence right? Happy Now[[User:ShonaNdebele Historian|ShonaNdebele Historian]] ([[User talk:ShonaNdebele Historian#top|talk]]) 16:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)}} [[User:ShonaNdebele Historian|ShonaNdebele Historian]] ([[User talk:ShonaNdebele Historian#top|talk]]) 16:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShonaNdebele Historian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That’s being barbaric by Bbb23 just blocking everyone like thatShonaNdebele Historian (talk) 16:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You had three (!!!) separate open unblock requests. One at a time, please. You need to specifically address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ruud Gwirambira. Yamla (talk) 17:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShonaNdebele Historian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The problem comes when some of you moderators thinks you are gods on this planet. My goal is to improve Wikipedia by adding facts and relevant encyclopedic information about Zimbabwe and Mozambique. But to my disappointment Bbb23 blocked for asking question in relation to Ruud Gwirambira edit on Budiriro I don’t know maybe he got a beef with him. He even went on to delete all my articles edits which were seen and approved by other moderators. To my surprise when I visited his talk page, the talk there is all about bans meaning he is good at banning. I’m really hurts me. Most of you doesn’t even live in Zimbabwe or Mozambique. Are there not any moderator in these countries. I was touched by this act.ShonaNdebele Historian (talk) 21:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

that does not address the reasons for the block. Also, did you take the advice to read the guide to appealing blocks before posting this unblock request? Posting attacks on other editors is never a good way to get unblocked. JBW (talk) 21:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ShonaNdebele Historian (talk) 21:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]