Jump to content

User talk:Shodaddy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2008

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. KelleyCook (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection, you will be blocked from editing. KelleyCook (talk) 17:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection, you will be blocked from editing. Ianbetteridge (talk) 19:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to HDCP

[edit]

Hi. I would have put a warning on your talk page, as I have already done so with User:KelleyCook and User:Ianbetteridge regarding accusations of vandalism where it was not obvious, which went against the spirit of WP:AGF, but I see that you already appear to have been treated rather badly in response to your apparent good-faith edits, so I'm sorry to hear that, and I hope it does not discourage you from continueing to contribute to Wikipedia. FWIW, I think there needs to be a significant mention of HDCP strippers in the article, although, perhaps not in the opening paragraphs, but somewhere after the tabel of contents. If you can do this, and format it nicely, I'm sure there should be less reason to accuse it of being POV. All the best, --Rebroad (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]