User talk:Shloidain

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shloidain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked after reverting an edit made to the article New Holland (Australia) that had numerous errors. On top of this, I was given a full site ban despite only a single (relatively minor, in my opinion) edit to fix information that is factually incorrect.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, which is abuse of multiple accounts. Please review WP:SOCK and specifically address this. Yamla (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shloidain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Upon reviewing WP:SOCK, I do not understand why I have been accused of this offence. I have made a single basic edit to a page, and how in any way does this suggest that I have committed such an offence? I cannot address a reason unless I can understand what of my behaviour prompted one to believe I have committed this offence. If this is connected to the pre-existing block that is on my IP address, that block exists because of other members within the organisation that owns this device, not because of mine own actions.

Decline reason:

Well, that's vague. Maybe this shadowy organization that's pulling the strings of Wikipedia articles behind the scenes should stop doing so, then. If you've got something less vague to say, you can make another unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.