User talk:Shivanshkhare

Welcome

Hello, Shivanshkhare, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 17:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cptnono (talk) 19:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kolkata class destroyer animated.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kolkata class destroyer animated.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Project28c.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Project28c.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a question for you

Per this edit of yours, why did you add the image file of a Malaysian submarine into the article page of Indian Navy? Please note that I've reverted it pending an explanation from you. Tell me, is there something that you know, that which we don't know about, that caused you to add that image file? Please enlighten us, thank you. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 17:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Project28c.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Project28c.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 17:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kolkata class destroyer animated.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kolkata class destroyer animated.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 04:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kolkataslid4.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kolkataslid4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 07:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kolkataslid1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kolkataslid1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 07:39, 2 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:39, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive uploads.
The next time you upload an inappropriate image, such as those you listed at the article page of Kolkata class destroyer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
List of copyrights violation for image files you've uploaded to Wikipedia:

File:Project28c.jpg (deleted)
File:Kolkata class destroyer animated.jpg (deleted)
File:Kolkataslid1.jpg
File:Kolkataslid4.jpg

Please take note that this is your fourth violation of Wikipedia's standing policy of not accepting any images with copyrights issue. You are hereby being warned for the last and final time, do not upload anymore image files with copyright issue or you stand to be BLOCKED~! Take heed. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 09:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

If you are the photographer then I need to help you find a Wikipedia image specialist who can help you to fill in the licensing forms correctly. If you are not then you are at risk of being blocked for violation of copyright. One way or the other we need to start some dialogue here. Guy (Help!) 09:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chengdu J-20, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lest you forget, I warned you a year ago so don't think that I'm not monitoring your every move. Do this again and I guaranttee that you will be blocked before you know what had happened. Now get back in line and contribute to Wikipedia CONSTRUCTIVELY~! Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 16:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content to the article. Thanks. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 16:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chengdu J-20. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to BTR-90. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note: Per WP:BLOGS, Blogs or discussion forums are not reliable source. However, traditional media (eg. news agency or defence news journals, such as Agence France-Presse, Thomson Reuters or Jane's International Defence Review) can be use for citing your entry. Failing which, we will have to remove them for failing WP:Verifiability. Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 16:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/T72 Ajeya Mk.2 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/T72 Ajeya Mk.2, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]