User talk:Shivam Thiruppathi

June 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at The Greatest of All Time, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 06:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sneha (actress), you may be blocked from editing. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Archana Shastry, you may be blocked from editing. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Sri Ramadasu. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hi @Shivam Thiruppathi, I have noticed you have reverted my recent contributions without citing any reason. Do you have any valid reasons for the reverts? 456legend talk 10:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 456legend. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yanamala Rama Krishnudu have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 456legend talk 10:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 456legend. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Amma Unavagam have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 456legend talk 10:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shivam Thiruppathi, I have mentioned you on Talk:List of Telugu film actresses, participate in the discussion to resolve the dispute. Thank you 456legend talk 11:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at list of finance ministers of Andhra Pradesh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 456legend talk 11:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 456legend talk 03:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivam Thiruppathi,

Please come to the discussion on ANI and offer your side of the story. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Liz, the user haven't responded yet and another user is already actively involved in making similar changes. Any lead on this? 456legend talk 22:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shivam Thiruppathi Do you have a valid reason for reverting my edits again? You reverted the edits belonging to the other articles too. Please provide justification for your acts. @Liz please look into this. This user started to revert my edits again. 456legend talk 08:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the archived discussion on the Noticeboard Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1164#User:Shivam Thiruppathi and now attaching 2 other (occured today): [1] and [2] 456legend talk 08:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing, revert warring across multiple articles, and failure to communicate in edit summaries or talk pages. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and you are not collaborating. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eswaran Naveen. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]