User talk:Shirik/Archives/2009/November

Post Content

Why did you undo my edit to Joyeux Noel :( I fixed it to the way the movie really was, and you changed it back to that horse dung. Have you even watched it? Its really good! Felix is my hero, I model myself after him^^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samwouldntletusfinishjoyeuxnoel (talk • contribs) 06:52, 25 November 2009

Hi there. At the very minimum, the content you posted on Joyeux Noël was uncited and unverifiable. Furthermore, it was subjective, not objective. More importantly, though, content like "(if you edit this back you like da boys)" is easily argued as Vandalism and must be removed. I suggest you review Wikipedia policies before you continue editing pages to determine what is and isn't appropriate content. Regards, --Mpdelbuono (talk) 06:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

To our newest Rollbacker

I have just granted you rollback rights because I believe you to be trustworthy, and because you have a history of reverting vandalism and have given in the past or are trusted in the future to give appropriate warnings. Please have a read over WP:ROLLBACK and remember that rollback is only for use against obvious vandalism. Please use it that way (it can be taken away by any admin at a moment's notice). You may want to consider adding {{Rollback}} and {{User rollback}} to your userpage. Any questions, please drop me a line. Best of luck and thanks for volunteering! upstateNYer 05:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot :) I promise you won't be sorry. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 06:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and congrats

Hi..First of all thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page.. :)I reported that user last time and he is just so persistent. arunkumar^{checkmate me} 10:58, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem. Some people are very strange. But it all works out in the end. Honestly, I take vandalism of my talk/user page as a trophy -- it shows that I've pissed off some vandal because they're not getting their way, and need some other way to vent. Anyway, that user has a temp block (again) so he's out of commission for a while. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 17:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

		The Special Barnstar
		You got your rollback right recently and already you are countering established vandals.You also reverted vandalism on my user-page.Now that's a great beginning and wish you will be the ultimate nightmare for many more vandals in future.Take this barnstar as a token of my appreciation :) arunkumarcheckmate me 02:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey, thanks again; that was somewhat unexpected. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 02:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

What took ya'll so long?

I've been vandalizing the Ballad of Gay Tony page for, like, fifteen minutes.

C'mon, man! Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.28.243.118 (talk) 23:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

I apologize. I will try to be more on-top of things in the future. :) --Mpdelbuono (talk) 23:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

I hope so, my friend. =)

And, again, the game is afoot! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.28.243.118 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 25 November 2009

re: your message

Hi Mpdelbuono, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 04:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

F*** YOU

Malcolm Turnbull [talk courtesy blanked]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilsonturkey (talk • contribs) 08:56, 26 November 2009

I am sorry you feel that way. However, Malcolm Turnbull's actions do not justify your violation of Wikipedia policy. Please review them before continuing to edit articles. Thanks. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

THE IMAGE IS PORNAGRAPHIC

WHAT IS IT THAT YOU DONT UNDERSTAND —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.214.230.30 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 26 November 2009

Hi there. I assume you are referring to Autofellatio. As I mentioned on both the talk page and my edit summaries, Wikipedia is not censored. This is a policy across the project, and the article in question has already reached consensus (as also indicated on your talk page) that this image should remain. If you have a reason to break this consensus, preferably beyond that of "it is pornographic," you should discuss this change that you desire on the article's talk page so that everyone can come to a mutual agreement. I don't intend to start any kind of WP:Edit war, but I do intend to follow Wikipedia's policies and the general belief behind what wikipedia is and what wikipedia is not. Regards. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 09:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

"I am an avid World of Warcraft fan," yeah that figures.

You soft headed American fuckwit

"and a fan of Anime"

Yup, a child porn fetishist.

Man, I hope rednecks like you will be the first to go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.214.230.30 (talk) 09:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm sorry you feel that way. Unfortunately, I neither make policy nor have any major pull within the community, so ranting here isn't likely to get you much further to your desires. As I have already mentioned, the appropriate venue to take out your frustration is on the article's talk page, which you have kindly ignored (and I will also note a full answer to your inquiries is on that page as well). I'm going to go to sleep now, but I hope you get some time to think about what you've said so far and how it applies to Wikipedia as a whole. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 09:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me of false positive

I thought it was unexplained removal of content, but then you told me. Thanks for the head's up. ConCompS (Talk to me) 23:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem. I know how easily these things could happen when you're flying through Huggle. But hey, I look out for you, you look out for me, in the end we get to a better place. In all honesty, you're right, I think the article should be deleted, but he does have the right to remove WP:PROD. However, I put it up for WP:CSD which he can't remove, so perhaps that will go through; I think it's a valid CSD, personally. Keep up the good work, though! --Mpdelbuono (talk) 23:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

My edits

Hiya dude, so you're interested in special operations forces are you? Also, i accept your apologies! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.216.38 (talk) 01:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

It's some pretty fun stuff. I don't really get involved in the operations themselves, but get a lot of experience in what they ask for and the (sometimes insane) demands of technology special ops forces tend to ask for. But yes, working with cutting technology is really quite interesting; right now I have no plans of retiring, but then again I'm young and impressionable, too, I guess. Happy editing! --Mpdelbuono (talk) 01:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I am hoping to start a book writing project next year on... special forces! But I prefer to use speech recognition software as my mind goes faster than my writing! By the way, your in the perfect place to learn aeronautics, as it is the home of the Air Force Materiel Command, which RDT&E's all the weird tech stuff for the US Air Force! Also, I'm studying for the Certified Internet Webmaster (CIW) qualification (if ya know what it is!) so I can get a nice web development job! Jimbo ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.216.38 (talk) 01:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Ah, good luck with that :) --Mpdelbuono (talk) 02:23, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

User Boxes

HELP! Thanks for the welcome. I need help creating a user box for the number of articles that I have contributed to or edited. Is there a script that will give me a running count? Morning277 (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi there! Glad to see you're really getting into Wikipedia. You may try checking out {{User contrib}} to display your post count. Unfortunately, it does not automatically update your edit count for you, so you will have to go in and change the userbox manually (that's very trivial to do, and is discussed on the page I linked). To actually get your edit count, you can use various tools from the Toolserver. I prefer X's edit counter; you should find it fairly easy to use. It can tell you not only raw edit counts but a lot of other information as well. I encourage you to check it out. And of course, please feel free to ask any more questions! Regards, --Mpdelbuono (talk) 17:05, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! Morning277 (talk) 19:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Harper's Island Edit

The information about the episode 1 title "Whap" is incorrect. As shown in my revisions, the proper explaination of the title is "The sound made during the bifurcation of Marty Dunn." This information can be verified on the Harper's Globe Wiki page about each episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.109.123 (talk) 05:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

If that's the case, could you please specify a citation along with your modification so that it can be tracked in the future? Thanks. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 06:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)