Jump to content

User talk:Shiningdove

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Shiningdove, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Dolphin51 (talk) 00:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Insane Joy

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Insane Joy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails Notability:Books, very little coverage and no awards.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Unitarian Bahai Association, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://unitarianbahai.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

Just in case you don't know about the WP:3RR rule, but Wikipedia has a rule that disallows at a minimum reverting a page more than three times in 3 days, with the possibility of being blocked. Reverts in this case can be thought of generally as undoing any part of any others edits. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I didn't know about that. I only undid your edit once, and I mostly made tweaks to edits made by others today, not undoing them either entirely or substantially. Shiningdove (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I know. My message was not malicious, but just letting you know so that you don't walk into any specific problems. One thing to note is that a "revert is any action, including administrative actions, that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part." Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk)