User talk:Shevakumaran

Speedy deletion nomination of Relief India Trust

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Relief India Trust, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 182.64.147.90 (talk) 06:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Relief India Trust

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Relief India Trust requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 182.64.147.90 (talk) 06:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Relief India Trust

The article Relief India Trust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Scam Trust, soliciting donations to a fake entity over phone. People see it has a wiki page and believe it is genuine. No physical existence at given address, except call center

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 182.64.147.90 (talk) 06:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Relief india trust because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sahara India Pariwar - March 2014

In case you have a NPoV reference on the medical condition, please add it. Otherwise the statement about medical condition cannot be put in an encyclopaedia as it is just a statement of defence, and this is not the adequate place for it. Similarly, no charges against Roy and other directors have been added on the page, because a neutral reference is missing. Only thing added is that he and 2 other directors are in judicial custody, which is merely a fact and does not take any position.

Champi4mcollege (talk) 10:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reverting you on the same exact edits you are still making. Stop. There is no need to have why he missed a court. This about the company and not the person. Only add if it relates to the company. Bgwhite (talk) 05:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sahara India Pariwar. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Bgwhite (talk) 06:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Subrata Roy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 07:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Removing any material about the trial at Sahara India Pariwar or Subrata Roy will result in you being blocked. The trial is relevant at both articles and has been covered extensively in the media. Bgwhite (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You had to do it again. You removed material about the trial. You did add material about the bail, but it was already in the article under "Controversy". Controversy contains everything about the trial. The lede only mention the controversy as ledes are supposed to do. I warned you about removing material. You are block three days for removing material about the trial. If it happens again, the block becomes longer. Bgwhite (talk) 05:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now you removed the entire controversy sections in both articles. The block is a week for removing all the material about the trial. Bgwhite (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of One Week for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Sahara India Pariwar and Subrata Roy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bgwhite (talk) 05:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bgwhite (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shevakumaran. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Relief India Trust

Hello, Shevakumaran. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Relief India Trust".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. IM3847 (talk) 11:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]