User talk:ShermanDuArthur
ShermanDuArthur, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]![]() |
Hi ShermanDuArthur!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! |
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/300px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/25px-Face-smile.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia, ShermanDuArthur! Thank you for your contributions. I am CyberWarfare and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! --CyberWarfare (talk) 23:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Added note
[edit]In the case an editor leaves a note on your talk page that was done in bad faith, its vandalism. I noticed the vandalism done on your page, and it did upset me, check out the vandalism policy and some other links there. If it happens again simply revert and ignore (: --CyberWarfare (talk) 23:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c9/Octagon-warning.svg/30px-Octagon-warning.svg.png)
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Unblock request
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Appointment_green.svg/48px-Appointment_green.svg.png)
ShermanDuArthur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Well, I'm honestly very surprised that someone really thought I'm vandalizing when I'm actually removing vandalism. Has anyone seen how the article List of Katie and Orbie episodes looks right now? The article, as well as its parent Katie and Orbie have been targeted since 2015 by someone who keeps changing character and episode descriptions by adding poorly and plagiarized machine-translated text claiming to do it for fun. The person then reports me to AIAV and I'm the one getting blocked? This is a mistake, I've known this site and its rules for many years, and have never vandalized or blanked a single article, I'm just removing the unfunny garbage this individual adds to the aforementioned articles. Please remove my block. ShermanDuArthur (talk) 07:16, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Accept reason:
The block was clearly incorrect, so I have unblocked (with an appropriate message in your block log). Thank you for cleaning up that article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- I have also put Katie and Orbie and List of Katie and Orbie episodes on my watchlist (and I've semi-protected the latter for a brief period), and I'll deal with the problematic IP editor if they continue with this nonsense. If you see anything similar at any other articles, please feel free to let me know on my talk page and I'll deal with it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies for the mistaken block. I should've looked more closely at the edit history of the article rather than just your edits. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much! Have a nice day. ShermanDuArthur (talk) 17:30, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I saw what that IP did to you not long ago when you were cleaning his dirty work at the aforementioned article. At this point, given that I do not know if that IP user has access to a user account, I'm going to go ahead and put a request for temporal protection to see if that vandal will forget about it. If that does not work, then it is my own opinion that the article may have to be indefinitely protected fully.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 20:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)