User talk:Shawdow

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Academic Challenger 00:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Academic Challenger 01:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Academic Challenger 01:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Academic Challenger has blocked me for reasons unjust. I recieved two warning, both of those very just, and I accpet them. I then, proceeded to make a realistic topic, where I wrote about a certain charcter from the Mini Series Red vs. Blue. This is no non-sense and not vandilism, yet it was marked as such. I feel this is wrong, and foolish, and that he was over-obessed with trying to block me due to my previous non-sense statements.

I see he thinks it's okay not even to respond. I can't believe someone to be so un-fair.

Repreated Vandalism

Please do not add nonsense like So then I said to the Walrus Hey to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Williamborg (Bill) 01:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice your message on your talk page. There are a lot of people to deal with here. Anyway, I'm sorry that I thought that your third article was vandalism. It probably wasn't, but it was so incoherent that it looked like vandalism. I will try to be more careful in the future. However, you really need to stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, and if you add legitimate content you need to make sure that it is in the correct style. It seems that you have added some nonsense since your block expired. However, I could mentor you on the right way to write in Wikipedia. What do you want to write about? By the way, please don't edit my user page.

Take care. Academic Challenger 01:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back. Please do not blank your talk page, and please be careful before you write articles. I deleted your article "how to smell" because it is really unnecessary. Academic Challenger 00:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Why can't I blank my talk page?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawdow (talk • contribs) 13:37, October 29, 2006

You can. It's your Talk page. --ElKevbo 22:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Albert Einstein. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --ElKevbo 22:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Shutewpid

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shutewpid, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Shutewpid. Dchall1 (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)