User talk:Shaunjason

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here, and decide to stay.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert your name and timestamp, use (~~~~) (four tildes), or, to insert just your name, type (~~~) (three tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the sandbox.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you may want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Good luck, have fun, and be bold! SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Action on climate change

In seeing you pop onto the scene at Action on climate change, I'm wondering if you can think of a better title for the article? "Action on climate change" just seems to be a poor title, in my opinion. The fact that we have no boldfaced title in the first bit of the article seems to drive this point home.

Wondering what you think. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I was thinking about this one while looking at the other topics covered under the climate-change umbrella on here already. My suggestion would be either "Climate Change Reaction" or "Climate Change Response" or "Climate Change Reaction and Response". This would however tend to broaden to scope of this article to include the negative (re)actions as well, but I think if a tone was set to simply briefly address them while maintaining the postive actions undertaken as the meat of the article, we'll do it justice. The article "scientific opinon on global change" already addresses the debate issue, so we wouldnt have to turn it into that. Im working for a research institute in DC on the sub-national issue, so eventually I'll be adding more material on the city-level and international level soon. If I come up with anyother clever titles, Ill post them.-Shaunjason 18:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Newlogo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Newlogo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]