User talk:Shaun1234567891

Speedy deletion nomination of Mary de post

Hello Shaun1234567891,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mary de post for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. WMartin74 (talk) 09:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacob Bragg

Hello, Shaun1234567891. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jacob Bragg, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Jacob Bragg to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 16:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun1234567891, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Shaun1234567891! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm Melonkelon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jacob Bragg because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Melonkelon (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicklas Bendtner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Luis Suárez, you may be blocked from editing. —mc10 (t/c) 23:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Justin Knapp. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 05:15, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 08:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]