User talk:Sharry99

Speedy deletion nomination of ACCA PAKISTAN

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on ACCA PAKISTAN, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 23:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article American Alligator, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please give a citation for these numbers. Mokele (talk) 23:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT add information without a reference. Mokele (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to American Alligator. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mokele (talk) 12:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Saltwater Crocodile. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Do not just add stuff because you think it sounds cool. Mokele (talk) 12:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mugger crocodile, you will be blocked from editing. Mokele (talk) 12:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger, you will be blocked from editing. Seduisant (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USE REFERENCES! Mokele (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Saltwater Crocodile, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mokele (talk) 12:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Tiger. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Seduisant (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing, specifically repeatedly adding the same unsourced information and refusing to provide requested references. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better...

Good, now let's see a reference that isn't laughably unreliable. Hint - random shit you find on the internet isn't a reference. Peer-review scientific journals are a reference.Mokele (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Tiger, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The same nonsensical "source" from Mrs. Turner's page at the Mark Twain Elementary School has repeatedly been inserted into the subject article again. Evidently, the block was not a sufficient deterrent. This is your final warning. Seduisant (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tiger. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Tiger. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Seduisant (talk) 12:21, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Tiger, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have added the same content to the Tiger article that resulted in a block last month. Stop now. Seduisant (talk) 17:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]