User talk:Sharmaru

Welcome!

Hello, Sharmaru, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Addhoc 12:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stlawrencelogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Stlawrencelogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed the section of Allegations of Royal Massacre without any references. This must be undone. Allegations are not proven; first people are charged, and they are tried--which is called the due process of law. Hence, an allegation must exist in the page of a person. A news that involves a critical matter which involved a worldwide attention cannot be ignored. People have the right to know these information--which is Wiki's mission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hailbihar (talk • contribs) 18:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to tell you that there are significant differences between a "Blog" and "Article". A doctoral student/legal professional knows this better. And, I assert, this allegation must be in Wiki. I assume you are new to Wiki; people find all information about a public figure that is easily not available in articles or scholarly journals. You have no right to delete any Wiki section if a source is provided; you can modify or change language. Even now, if you disagree, I would ask you to file a petition with Wikipedia. However, the section must not be deleted. If Wiki agrees to your petition, I will take this matter off.

Fair use rationale for Image:Auclogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Auclogo.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]