Jump to content

User talk:Shark32322

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Shark32322, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Murph9000 (talk) 13:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shark32322, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Shark32322! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Shark32322. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Murph9000 (talk) 13:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

How was my Work at the Tom clancy pages

[edit]
About the Work at tom clancy 
did i do well? Shark32322 (talk) 21:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Your recent edits have all contained problems and have been reverted. Among the problems were unexplained changes in facts, changes which were grammatically bad, unnecessary, or just did not seem like a constructive contribution. Overall, it gives the impression of someone who is intentionally trying to be disruptive. I am not the only person who has reverted your changes. Murph9000 (talk) 22:11, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Edits were constructive

[edit]
My Edits were connstructive because
It was Grammar fixes
and added useful info
Please do not revert
If you revert again
You will Go to Administrator Incident board