User talk:Shanthiniketan

Shanthiniketan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shanthiniketan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

On Removing the Article Edited

You can't just remove any edit made by me. I have given a relevant reference of Kabali in highest grossing films. The reference is of Indian Express which is considered a relevant source. Please do make amendments or else I will have to take another way.

Rahrumi (talk) 17:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BRD

Hi there, when content you submit is reverted with a rational reason by another editor, resubmitting it as you did here and here is not constructive. and it constitutes edit-warring. Per WP:BRD, your duty is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for your change if it is reverted. In this case, chitraloka.com looks like every other blog that gets submitted as sources. There's no indication of: who's running the site, who the editor-in-chief is, whether or not they have an editorial policy, what makes them an expert... So there's no clear indication that this site should be considered reliable. Per WP:RS, we only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. Unless you're in a position to argue that chitraloka.com has an established reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, it should not be used. Anyone can start a blog or media website and print whatever he wants. There should be no presumption that these sites are reliable until they earn a reputation for being reliable. And in response to your edit summary here, I never said that a distributor's claims falls under secondary sources. I would absolutely consider them a primary source, as they are financially involved in the success of the film. We only care what independent sources say. A distributor would have every reason to fudge the numbers because they're intrinsically involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Radhika Pandit— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 17:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained reordering of cast

Hi there, re: this, please don't reorder cast without providing an explanation consistent with established guidelines. This tends to look like you're entertaining some arbitrary preference, which would not be constructive. Please see Template:Infobox film and WP:FILMCAST instructions. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

xXx: Return of Xander Cage Budget

The source mentioned doesn't have any trustworthy track record with budget estimates. Also, a production budget of $350 million is outlandish, look at other films; it is unreasonable. --EddyGA (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Teamsreesanthposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teamsreesanthposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:XXX Return of Xander Cage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XXX Return of Xander Cage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2.0 (film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2.0 (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Motta Shiva Ketta Shiva.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motta Shiva Ketta Shiva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2.0 (film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2.0 (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hebbuli poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hebbuli poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kadavul Irukaan Kumaru.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kadavul Irukaan Kumaru.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kadavul Irukaan Kumaru.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kadavul Irukaan Kumaru.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kadavul Irukaan Kumaru.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kadavul Irukaan Kumaru.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]