User talk:Shannonheward

David Bradford (businessman)

Blogs are not reliable sources. Woogee (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to David Bradford (businessman) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 05:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You were already given instruction about sourcing and linking when you were editing as an anon. Creating an account doesn't make the improper links somehow better. Woogee (talk) 05:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to David Bradford (businessman). Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 05:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to David Bradford (businessman). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Zhang He (talk) 05:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to David Bradford (businessman). Zhang He (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Shannon Heward
Executive Assistant to David Bradford, Fusion IO

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article David Bradford (businessman), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

== You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{1}}}]]. Thank you. ==

Sockpuppetry case

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jodimardesich. Thank you. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 05:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been closed. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jodimardesich/Archive Shannonheward (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]