User talk:ShamerockShakes
ShamerockShakes, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi ShamerockShakes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC) |
A page you started (Jean Eddy Saint Paul) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Jean Eddy Saint Paul, ShamerockShakes!
Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
If possible, kindly add more references. Thanks.
To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
—usernamekiran(talk) 21:13, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Jean Eddy Saint Paul for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Eddy Saint Paul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Eddy Saint Paul until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Olivier Jolivet for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olivier Jolivet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivier Jolivet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)