User talk:Shah Khwaja

October 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed content from Golra Sharif without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Communication is required

Please see the policy supplement wp:communication is required. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Logging in and out to make disruptive edits is wp:sockpuppetry
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Golra Sharif, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk) 01:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 16 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Golra Sharif, Naseer-uddin-Naseer and Shrine of Meher Ali Shah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zaydbinumar (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Shah Khwaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22978 was submitted on Oct 18, 2018 06:22:12. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shah Khwaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What I Edited was true. Please have a survey on some Pakistani People that who is the Custodian of Golra Sharif

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 10:30, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shah Khwaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not involved in 'Damage' or 'Disruption' . I just edited the page with the right information instead of wrong information.An administrator should be for the right purposes. It is his/her duty unless he/she wants to do his duty according to his own consent. I hope my block should be withdrawn immediately iff there are proper judgement of administrators.

Decline reason:

This does not address your block evasion. Any further unblock requests which do not address your block evasion will result in you losing access to this talk page. Yamla (talk) 11:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shah Khwaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is there any administrator here? , why i m blocked let me know

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Since you have now used the appeal process three times without once making a cogent argument for unblocking your account, I have revoked your talkpage access. Should you wish to appeal again, UTRS is now your only recourse. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.