Jump to content

User talk:Sgoldstein29

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image tagging for File:Rabbi Steve Greenberg, Fabio Seixo - Agência O Globo, Rio de Janeiro.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rabbi Steve Greenberg, Fabio Seixo - Agência O Globo, Rio de Janeiro.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sgoldstein29. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 02:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Epeefleche, I'm not sure if I should respond here or on your talk page, but the conflict of interest issue was brought up a while ago by Lisa, who may be in serious COI herself as she has a biased opinion of Steve Greenberg and tries to edit to that bias. She won't confirm who she is, but she is Lisa Liel, who has made close to libelous comments about Steve Greenberg on a number of sites and blogs. You can follow the COI argument on the talk page of Steven Greenberg (rabbi) under the Apologetics heading.Sgoldstein29 (talk) 02:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here is fine, as a place to reply. I've added an infobox to the page under discussion, and improved it slightly. But the COI rules do appear to apply to you, so I left you the above. I don't know whether they apply to her as well, but if they do she could receive the same information. You probably want to become familiar as well with WP:OUTING. I've personally experienced difficulty editing an article touched by the editor in question, so I understand your upset. But the information I posted for you applies, nevertheless, to your editing. Best. Epeefleche (talk) 05:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Steven Greenberg (rabbi) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeairn (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rabbi Steve Greenberg, Fabio Seixo - Agência O Globo, Rio de Janeiro.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rabbi Steve Greenberg, Fabio Seixo - Agência O Globo, Rio de Janeiro.jpeg, which you've attributed to Fabio Seixo. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rabbi Steve Greenberg, Fabio Seixo - Agência O Globo, Rio de Janeiro.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rabbi Steve Greenberg, Fabio Seixo - Agência O Globo, Rio de Janeiro.jpeg, which you've attributed to A VRT notice was applied over 60 day(s) ago, but no message at VRTS has been found since this tag was applied... I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 12:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]