User talk:Sevindiknesiboglu2008

October 2020

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Yuxarı Maralyan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Isabelle ^🔔 17:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Zəngilan, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. With regard to WP:NPOV, neutral and reliable sources needs to be utilized for the content of Wikipedia articles. AntonSamuel (talk) 12:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm new to Wikipedia. All I know is that Zangilan was liberated from occupation by Azerbaijan. And Zangilan is Azerbaijan! The whole world should know this! Karabakh is Azerbaijan Sevindiknesiboglu2008 (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Karabakh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 11:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a breaker. They are the offenders. An German website wrote about the realities of Azerbaijan. Several Armenians intervened and threatened the journalist who wrote the truth. Thus, those words were deleted. You suggest that I take another look at the rules of Wikipedia. I also recommend you to look at the course of the First and Second Karabakh Wars. Look at the repetition of the Khojaly genocide in Barda and Ganja. Then look at the Armenian Church and the Armenian Library in Baku. I have many such recommendations. And if you are interested in my advice, then you will understand me. Otherwise, I have no word for you. I just have one word. Karabakh is Azerbaijan! You do not know Karabakh better than Karabakh people. Therefore, you have written part of Imishli and Sabirabad as Karabakh, and this is ridiculous. --Sevindiknesiboglu2008 (talk) 15:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may not like it but Artsakh still exists. Do not vandalize articles again. --Golbez (talk) 14:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No! Even if you deny it! You are jealous of Azerbaijan's victory! With the departure of separatists from Aghdam on November 20, Kalbajar on November 25 and Aghdam on December 1, Karabakh as a whole returns to Azerbaijan. At the same time, such a policy of genocide will not be a separatist and nail-biting "state". If you were subjected to genocide, you would act like me. From the day I arrived, users like you have denied me the truth and oppressed me. But they do not know that Karabakh is Azerbaijan! --Sevindiknesiboglu2008 (talk) 15:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice, but you will be blocked if you continue making such unsourced edits. --Golbez (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For someone who is after the truth, this is not a big thing for me, so I'm not worried at all. Azerbaijan triumphed. If you want to prevent me, do so, these efforts mean nothing to me.If you want to learn the truth, follow the Azerbaijani press. He is my source. Because the truth is mentioned there. Fortunately, users like you did not delete the Khojaly massacre page. Otherwise, they would have deleted it too. I have no words other than that. --Sevindiknesiboglu2008 (talk) 15:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course we didn't delete it, it happened. Just like how Artsakh still exists. Unless there was some story about how Azerbaijan conquered Stepanakert that we all somehow missed? --Golbez (talk) 14:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not messing with you. Just leave me alone. If you were neutral in the previous conflict, you would mark Khankendi as "the place where Armenians call Stepanakert and Azerbaijanis call Khankendi." Azerbaijan did not conquer Stepanakert and liberated Khankendi. This is not a story, this is the truth. If you were neutral on the old conflict again, you would respect the information of both parties. What can I say, this is your opinion. Even if you don't respect my opinion, I respect your opinion. I close the conversation because you don't like to tell the truth. Karabakh is Azerbaijan! --Sevindiknesiboglu2008 (talk) 20:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yuksal Alizade moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuksal Alizade, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry, I forgot to refer. If I quote, won't you delete the page? Sevindiknesiboglu2008 (talk) 10:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yuksal Alizade

Hello, Sevindiknesiboglu2008. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuksal Alizade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuksal Alizade

Hello, Sevindiknesiboglu2008. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuksal Alizade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ahmad Amanov

The article Ahmad Amanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Said Jafarov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Said Jafarov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Said Jafarov

Hello, Sevindiknesiboglu2008. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Said Jafarov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]