User talk:Sevenplusone

Welcome!

Hello, Sevenplusone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Luksuh 04:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tom Liverpool FC

I'm afraid I'm not an admin, so can't block anyone! Try reporting such vandals at WP:AIAV to get admin attention. Cheers Stephenb (Talk) 08:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

Do you actually plan on bringing those up to standards? If not, you may want to read WP:OWN. You have no need to bring those back unless the can actually meet the guideline. TTN 12:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are being worked on. --> 7+1 12:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So would you care to show where you're getting your detailed production and critical reception information? If you're just saying that and you're just going to leave them, they'll be redirected again in another run. TTN 12:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss it on the seperate talk pages. -->7+1 12:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you just show me here instead of trying to just make me go away? If you're going to do it, you need sources. Otherwise, they'll be sitting there as they have been. TTN 12:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No

Yes

While I may not agree with what you say mrcrotch, I will fight to the death your right to say it. ;D --> 7+1 00:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Timesbold

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Timesbold, by Katr67, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Timesbold seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Timesbold, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Timesbold itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for not taking the deletion personally. You can probably get an administrator (I'm not one), perhaps the one who did the deletion, to undelete the article, at least so you can retrieve the info and not have to start over from scratch, but at the same time, I think it would be a good idea to work on the article off the wiki, either in a text editor or in user space (let me know if you need help with that), being sure you assert the notability of the band and providing reliable sources. My main concern with the article as it stood was that the article did not say why the band was notable, and thus it looked like an advertisement. I see Whip (folk band) could use some attention too. Good luck and happy editing! Katr67 16:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: James Fowler; Didier Zokora; List of high schools in New Jersey; Angolan Cup; Sebastian Larsson; Northern League Division One; Scottish Football League Premier Division; Ryan Smith (footballer); Chicago Outfit; North West Counties Football League Division One; Liskeard Athletic F.C.; Arturo Lupoli; Ryan Garry; Saltash United F.C.; Julien Rodriguez; Matthew Connolly; Alexandre Song; Oldham Town F.C.; Northern Counties East Football League Division One

Cleanup: Xin Dynasty; BBC Sport; Bakelite
Merge: Scottish Premier League; List of post-hardcore bands; Tring Corinthians F.C.
Add Sources: VfB Stuttgart; Alloa Athletic F.C.; Justin Hoyte
Wikify: Apocalyptic literature; Darvel F.C.; Harchester United F.C.
Expand: Billy Bingham; Women's football (soccer); Zinedine Zidane

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

Thank you. I am going to report him to administrators. Britney-Boy 02:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiesto template

I responded. -- DJREJECTED 12:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We should work on this together, maybe someone else will come in. But we should also add more singles! We need to recruit some individuals...I'm going to write on the Tiesto page. -- DJREJECTED 12:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magik

I Suppose i can finish off the magik series. you can start lost treasures. Alexander Vince 28 June 2007 (UTC)

excellent, i guess ill do forbidden paradise. Alexander Vince 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Template:Kilmarnock F.C. squad

The template is set at 80% width. Adding breaks to make it fit nicely on 'your' screeen may not work on other people's screens. The inherent design means that breaks are automatic, and forced breaks are unnecessary. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 21:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's the bullets used (•). They have a peculiar effect on inferior web browsers. I'll use "-" in future. Thanks for the clue. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 21:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Now I need to figure out which ones I've used bullets on, so I can change all of them too! slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 21:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edmonton municipal election, 1960

I've reverted your edit to this page for the following reason: as I create articles on the figures who were redlinked in that article, I use the "What links here" tool as an aid in developing the article (it gives me the ability to see at a glance which elections the individual ran in, information that isn't currently centralized anywhere else). For that tool to be of any use, the redlinks in question have to stay. You'll note that only some figures in the article are linked; I have been careful to link only those on whom I plan to create an article. Moreover, I have been very careful to ensure that none of the links are misdirected.

If you disagree profoundly with my action, then revert again and I'll live with your reversion, re-inserting the links after I've created the articles in question. But in the meantime the redlinks seem to me to be doing some good and no harm. Sarcasticidealist 20:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MervynAndyLuke.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MervynAndyLuke.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 09:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NahooToo

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of NahooToo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.celticmusicusa.com/store/products/all/497_nahootoo!/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:DerekDYE.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DerekDYE.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Folksonthehill.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Folksonthehill.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DYEcast.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DYEcast.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Damonquinn.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Damonquinn.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arthur heckler.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Arthur heckler.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FreedomFightersOST.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:FreedomFightersOST.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Marty McCann Priest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marty McCann Priest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of And So I Watch You From Afar

A tag has been placed on And So I Watch You From Afar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 17:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sure. I just tag them if I notice no real notability assertion and no refs. But go ahead and give it a HoldOn, and then ref it. Happy editing! Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 18:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:K45Spirit.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:K45Spirit.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Sevenplusone! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Damon Quinn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michael McDowell (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brian Houston (musician)

The article Brian Houston (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SugarQueen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SugarQueen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]