User talk:Serhio/Archive 3

Fetească

Dear Serhio, I don't understand why you flipped, what kind of reference do you want for using the indefinite form of the noun, which by the way it is the accepted form in the other Wikipedia articles (Fetească, Fetească Neagră, Fetească Regală). You can also have a look here: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name). What is your source? A website that doesn't use diacritics at all? Either you use diacritics or get rid of them altogether. Let's not get ridiculous and quibble over a breve, shall we? Mentatus (talk) 09:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Man, the inarticulate denomination for the grape is "Feteasca Regală" the articulated one is "Feteasca Regala". The specified catalog was used to indicate the origin of the grape, not the name. Generally speaking, we can move the articles to an undiactitical form, that is widely used in the catalogs and English, Moldovan and also Romanian web pages. --serhio ^talk 10:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

"Man" :), it's pretty inarticulate what you're saying, sorry. Have a look here in the DEX. "Fetească" is an adjective (meaning "of Feteşti) which became a noun. The indefinite form of this noun is "Fetească", while the definite form is "Feteasca". Thus, "Feteasca Regală" is the definite form and "Fetească Regală" the indefinite. And btw, in Romanian the adjectives sitting after the noun are never definite (and thus "Feteasca Regala" is *NOT* a correct form). Regarding the usage of diacritics, this is still a proposal, but nevertheless it is adhered to by the majority of the articles using titles in Romanian (e.g. Chişinău, Constanţa, Bălţi and so on). Mentatus (talk) 11:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

this is quite concludent. Well.. I think you are right. I'll rename it correctly. --serhio ^talk 07:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Moldovan language

Concerning this edit, the apolitical point of view the the scientific (more precisely the linguistic) one. You reverted a netral fromulation in a political one. I'm going to revert your edit tomorrow if you don't have anything to say about it. --Olahus (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Mine formulation is apolitical, cause specifies only the fact that the language is used in Moldova as official one. Your edit is politicized, cause references it to the "Romanian". Mine edits are based on the Moldovan Constitution, but yours only by your personal "scientific opinion". --serhio ^talk 19:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment+Question

Wow your really from Moldova, is it nice there?--EZ1234 (talk) 09:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Heh, man, is it very exotic for you, Moldova? Yes, I am from Moldova and I consider Chisinau to be one of the best cities in the world, also Moldovan girls the nicest on the planet. The only way to figure out a proper image it is to come here. By chance, there is any problem at this point. You should only have some money for the ticket to Chisinau, there is no Visa regime for the EU, USA and some other developed counties. The life isn't very expensive here, except if you wouldn't buy apartments here :) --serhio ^talk 22:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Sounds nice but I'm still at skool and its quite far away from Australia. You should come visit Australia, its quite alright.--EZ1234 (talk) 11:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, Australia is the country that I respect much and I'll be pleased to visit. But when you'll grow up and be able to travel you can visit Moldova anytime, it seems that is no VISA regime with Australia as well. People from Moldova emigrate to Australia too, even if it is considered to be more difficult than to Canada, for example. --serhio ^talk 11:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I've seen some nicer cities in Europe, but gotta agree about girls in Moldova, or, at least in Chisinau (haven't been to other cities much). ;-) --Illythr (talk) 00:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, Serhio where else have you been?--EZ1234 (talk) 12:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Transnistria

Serhio, "with" ("c") and "within" ("внутри", "в пределах"), are two different English words. The formulation "within the internationally recognised borders of Moldova" means that only Moldova's borders are internationally recognized. --Illythr (talk) 11:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, I understand, but I don't consider we always should evidentiate words borders and internationally concerning Transnistria. You see, in such a way we underline the self existence of borders, and I try to avoid to keep attention on the "borders of Transnistria", even "within the internationally recognized borders of Moldova". If you know what I mean... --serhio ^talk 15:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Uhh, the borders in that sentence are those of Moldova. The ones you can see on any political map issued outside of Transnistria. The existing borders between Transnistria and Moldova are not "internationally recognized", except as a demarcation line or something. That part of the article mentions Moldova's official borders only.--Illythr (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I repeat I understand that there is Moldovas official borders. But see my post above. If didn't get the point then let it down. :) --serhio ^talk 20:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Since the "borders of Transnistria" are not mentioned there at all, there is nothing to avoid drawing attention to... --Illythr (talk) 22:59, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

ok, man, peace to your house! :) --serhio ^talk 11:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Do keep up the good work. You're the one to show the rest of us how time on Wikipedia SHOULD be spent. ;-) --Illythr (talk) 15:33, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

User page help

Dear Serhio...I see that you have requested help in getting your user page in order and am willing to help you. My suggestions will not be full of a lot of flashy formatting. In my opinion, the less a user page looks like a Wikipedia page, the harder it is to read and navigate. You can go to my user page to see how an infobox can handle most of the routine information which you can expand upon if you so desire in the body of your user page.

To keep this conversation all in one place, you can respond on your talk page here. However, I ask that you put {{Talkback|Serhio|User page help}} on my talk page to alert me to your response. Either way, I would like to hear back from you.

Have a nice day! - LA @ 02:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:raion

Stiam si eu asa, dar am scris cum scrie in lege.Xasha (talk) 11:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Kudos

Vad ca in cele 4+ luni cat eu n-am fost, ai lucrat la WP serios. Bravo. Dc76\^talk 06:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

[1] no problem. It was just a matter of taste. I was erasig the Noticeboard ... (merging it into WikiProject Moldova), and this was one of a couple of things I thought worth keeping. But I did not even bother to compare with other projects. Feel free to undo me anytime on matters of taste. Dc76\^talk 21:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

poti sa contribui si tu cand vei avea timp, te rog cheers, Dc76\^talk 17:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

map projection

Hi Serhio,

i found your map "http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/AdministrativeMapOfMoldova.png" of Moldova. Now i want to import and reference it into a mapping tool (oziexplorer). Do you know the projection and the ellipsoid used for this map? Is it based on WGS84 or Krassowskij?

Thanks and greetings from Germany Ralf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.246.32.33 (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Moldovan wineries

Hi Serhio, I'm writing to you about the 15 (approx) Moldovan winery articles that you created on the English Wiki. Some of us in the Wiki-Wine-Project are currently doing a cleanup and improvement campaign, and we would like to invite you to help us. If you have time and willingness, could you improve the Moldovan winery articles?:

• Some of them appear to be not notable according to WP:N, and might be deleted if notability cannot be shown. You would have to look for notable information from reliable independent sources
• I've already looked for information in English in Google, but was unable to find anything. Perhaps you could easily find information and sources in Moldovan. There must be something, especially about the underground caverns at Milesti Mici, Branesti and Cricova.

--BodegasAmbite (talk) 09:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Barza Alba (winery) and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Barza Alba (winery), Aur-Vin (winery). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barza Alba (winery) for Barza Alba (winery), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aur-Vin (winery) for Aur-Vin (winery). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meriada (winery)

The article Meriada (winery) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability since May 2008 with no improvement and no activity on the talk page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tomas e (talk) 18:54, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Foxtrot (group)

A tag has been placed on Foxtrot (group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pim Rijkee (talk) 22:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Ping

You have a new message at Commons. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 05:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Glass of wine MD.png

Thank you for uploading File:Glass of wine MD.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:57, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:MoldovanGDPBySector.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MoldovanGDPBySector.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:MoldovanGDPBySector.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MoldovanGDPBySector.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 03:19, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Moldova

Hello,

I noticed that you are a fellow active member of WikiProject Moldova. Some time ago I created a new userbox for the project and proposed that it become official. Since no responses have been made as of yet, I am hoping to spark a discussion at Template talk:WikiProject Moldova User on the matter.

Mulțumesc,

Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 16:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:MWID notice

A tag has been placed on Template:MWID notice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the WikiProject is gone - CSD G8 - dependent on deleted page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/MoldovanWines articles by quality statistics

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/MoldovanWines articles by quality statistics, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/MoldovanWines articles by quality statistics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/MoldovanWines articles by quality statistics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Collab-moldWine

Template:Collab-moldWine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:VeaceslavNegruta.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VeaceslavNegruta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MoldovanGDPBySector.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MoldovanGDPBySector.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 08:23, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikinewsPortalMoldova

Template:WikinewsPortalMoldova has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:48, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Companies of Moldova by region

Category:Companies of Moldova by region, which you created, has been nominated for merging to Category:Companies of Moldova. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 04:10, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Villagio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Villagio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villagio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Moldova wine region

Template:Infobox Moldova wine region has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 11:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BOE Technology (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BOE Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Anarchyte 03:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Serhio, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Anarchyte 03:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Svetlana Toma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Svetlana Toma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svetlana Toma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 03:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:BOE Technology concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:BOE Technology, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Serhio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Bătuta Neagră

Hi. Your article "Bătuta Neagră" was PROD-ed by user Premeditated Chaos. Feel free to improve that article, if you want to see it kept. 10:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Serhio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Notice on sanctions on White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Bennv3771 (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:European Union Border Assistance Mission

A tag has been placed on Category:European Union Border Assistance Mission requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^{T go beyond} 16:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Serhio. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:GA-Class Moldova articles needing review

A tag has been placed on Category:GA-Class Moldova articles needing review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)