User talk:SergeDQ

Okay people, it's time to move on. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). SergeDQ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Before I made the changes to Yoshinori Kitase's page I talked about it on the talk page: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yoshinori_Kitase&oldid=655584198 (which was deleted after I was blocked) I made changes that resulted in one sentence, and I'm blocked, even after providing links and references. Since noone ever responded to what I said on the talk page, I re-added. Also, I'm not this g-zay sock puppet account that I was accused of. I've noticed on the history page anytime anyone outside of a small circle makes changes (even small ones) to Kitase's page, they are charged with being g-zay. While, I'm not sure about the whole g-zay thing, I can tell you that I'm definitely not him I posted what I wanted to change on the talk page, and added why I wanted that changed and gave links as to why I wanted it changed. With no reposnes I made the change. I see absolutely nothing wrong with what I wanted to add to the page, which just resulted in about a sentence worth of content int he first place. I hope we can clear this up, as I would really like to continue to contribute to wikipedia. Thanks SergeDQ (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: WP:DUCK sock. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. unblock This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). SergeDQ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I did abuse multiple accounts, and I'm very sorry about that. I can tell you from here on out I will not do that again. I was wondering if I could have one last chance to contribute to wikipedia? I will tell the username I will pick and only use that one name on this PC. I would really like to have one more chance to contribute on wikipedia. Thanks SergeDQ (talk) 20:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: Under the circumstances, a Standard Offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 20:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Is there anything I can do to do that? I can't use talk pages, as I'm not allowed to post. SergeDQ (talk) 20:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC) standard offer This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). SergeDQ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I'm not sure how to use 'standard offer', which was recommended to an admin here. I can't talk to other admins on their talk pages. How would I go about getting this resoled? I would really appreciate another chance to edit wikipedia. I understand what I did was wrong using numerous acocunts. I can absolutely guarnatee it won't happen again. I will tell the admins what username I would only use from here on out. Would like advice how I could approach this with the "standard offer" approach that was recommended. Thank you SergeDQ (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: You approach standard offer by not editing this site for at least 6 months, under any account. With so many recent socks, unblocking you right now is out of the question, sorry. Max Semenik (talk) 23:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.