User talk:Serenusaurelius

Hi!

Congratulations on very qualitative contributions in Moldovans, the controversy, Moldovenism. You can also check Category:Moldovan linguistic and ethnic controversy and WP:MDL. Dc76\^talk 10:52, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Anonimu (talk) 07:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Civility and Balkan warning

One of the fundamentals of editing on Wikipedia is to treat everyone with dignity and respect. Per the conversation on ANI noted above, your comments fall far short of that and are a violation of WP:CIVIL. Ordinarily that would bring a mild warning, but in the context of editing things having to do with Balkan conflicts we take a much harder line. Consider this a final warning. Toddst1 (talk) 07:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 07:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Moldovans. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...and due to the above, and your taunting of editors on contoversial/ARBMAC topics, I have blocked you for 24hrs. When you return, please ensure your behaviour is appropriate. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no complaint against the one-day suspension for violating the 3 reverts rule. However, as anyone can easily notice, I constantly try to find a compromise version. I found it often impossible to reach any compromise with user Anonimu, whose interference often consists of simply adding controversial sentences to chapters or sections entirely written by other editors, and then engaging in edit warring. Anonimu's contribution to the article Moldovans consist only in that and nothing more. Furthermore, the version chosen by the neutral editor Bwilkins was actually proposed by myself, which confirms that my sense of compromise is not idiosyncratic.(see http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Moldovans&action=historysubmit&diff=382101834&oldid=380846322) (Serenusaurelius) 18:24, 31 August 2010 (EST)

Problems with upload of File:Actiunea2012.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Actiunea2012.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Serenusaurelius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]