User talk:SerdoCowmoo

This is SerdoCowmoo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gracie The Dog (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ceethekreator were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gracie The Dog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gracie The Dog, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ceethekreator (talk) 22:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SerdoCowmoo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ceethekreator (talk) 22:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gracie The Dog (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gracie The Dog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gracie The Dog, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gracie the Dog (August 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AntiCompositeNumber was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: For an article to be accepted, the subject must be notable. To be considered notable, topics must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This draft does not include evidence of such coverage, and no such coverage was readily available in a Google search. YouTube subscribers are not part of the notability criteria.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gracie the English Springer Spaniel (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gracie the English Springer Spaniel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gracie the English Springer Spaniel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:09, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gracie the English Springer Spaniel (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not resubmit again without addressing the previous issues for declining the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gracie the English Springer Spaniel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gracie the English Springer Spaniel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gracie the English Springer Spaniel (August 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dfghfdsadfghj

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Dfghfdsadfghj, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 14:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Your account has been used only for vandalism, making legal threats and creating nonsense pages .

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I got blocked from wikipedia because my 4 year old brother vandleized my wikipedia page Draft:Dfghfdsadfghj i did not do that the page was about the new volkswagen electrick van he does not know how to use wikipedia but he knows how to edit and he destroryed my account he should be blocked not me

You are responsible for all edits made with your account. It is your responsibility to protect your account. As you failed to do so, we are not permitted to lift the block. --Yamla (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SerdoCowmoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here SerdoCowmoo (talk) 14:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know your account was compromised. As per WP:COMPROMISED, it is no longer eligible for unblock consideration. Yamla (talk) 14:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SerdoCowmoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i did not vandalise Draft:Dfghfdsadfghj my 4 year old brother got on to my account and purposly got me blocked for something i did not do my little brother did it

Decline reason:

As already noted, since you claim someone else got access to your account, it must remain blocked. This also doesn't even begin to address the reasons for the block. 331dot (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

how long am i blocked for?

How long am i blocked for?

This account will not be unblocked. It was compromised, so as per WP:COMPROMISED, we are not permitted to lift the block. --Yamla (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How long will my block last? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SerdoCowmoo (talk • contribs)

Stop asking questions we've already answered. The block will last forever. We are not permitted to lift the block. --Yamla (talk) 14:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this was indeed your little brother, create a new account with a different username and make sure that your little brother has no chance of getting control again. WP:LITTLEBROTHER. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access

Due to continued vandalism, I have revoked talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]