User talk:Sephiroth storm/Archives/2010/August
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Ref 7 on USCYBERCOM
Sephiroth - ref:
Your recent additions to the US Cyber Command article, while welcome, may be in violation of Wikipedia's WP:Copyvio rules, please review your contribution and make any necessary changes. In addition you removed a third party reference, which is our preferred method of citation, rather than first party. Consider reverting to the previous version and adding some info from the fact sheet into the mission section. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Sephiroth storm (talk) 22:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- My response: public domain
- U.S. government works
- For the U.S., federal government works are not eligible for copyright protection (17 USC 105). It is not clear whether this applies world-wide, see the CENDI Copyright FAQ list, 3.1.7 and a discussion on that at the LibraryLaw Blog.
- In practice, this means that much material on *.gov and *.mil, as well as material on some *.us web sites (such as the sites of the U.S. Forest Service), are in the public domain. Please note that not all such material is in the public domain, though:
Of note - I had a hand in authoring that content, and trust me - in came from no copyrighted sources. We were making it up as we went along! Regards, Warren Fish (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Nancybenoit.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:Nancybenoit.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Melesse, The source info is in the rationale box. The link is http://media.photobucket.com/image/nancy%20benoit/jamdin/nancybenoit.jpg Sephiroth storm (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- That's not a valid source. You need to list the photographer and/or the publication it came from. Melesse (talk) 04:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, can you point me to the policy regarding valid sources on these types of uploads? I followed the instructions on the upload form, including all available information. Your plate warning above states that "If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content." WP:CITE#IMAGE states that the author of the image should be listed if known. Looking at the image, I cannot determine the nature of the image, and have no way of contacting the owner of the photobucket account. A quick google images search reveals that the image appears to be unique. Therefore I must assume the owner of the photobucket is the original copyright owner. Thank you, Sephiroth storm (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- My quick Google images search turns up this image, which I feel invalidates your assumption that the image is unique. Guess I found the source for you. Melesse (talk) 09:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Amazing! It took me some time to find that image on GI. In any case, I still do believe the picture to qualify for non-free use on wikipedia. I will update the copyright info on the picture. Thanks! Sephiroth storm (talk) 13:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)