User talk:Sennaitgebremariam

August 2016

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution Noticeboard

The dispute resolution noticeboard is for the discussion of article content disputes. Both of your filings have been complaints about Otakrem, and neither of them has been stated as a content issue. I will be closing the current thread within 24 hours unless you explain exactly what the content issue is, without referring to another editor by name. As it is, it appears to be commenting on contributors, and that is not how DRN works. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Ethiopia. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Don't accuse editors of vandalism, unless with good cause. It's a serious accusation. The article's edit history shows a disagreement about the article content; in other words, a content dispute, though one that so far has been improperly conducted. The dispute must now be taken to the article talk-page, where I suggest you read the section titled Files. Haploidavey (talk) 20:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amhara people talk page

Hello, my name is Gabriella, i'm a new user, and i have a question for you, on the Amhara people talk page, there's a proposal to move the two sections(slavery and social stratification) to slavery in Ethiopia page, i would like to have your opinion on it. Currently two are in favor of moving it and one is opposing, thank you for time GabiloveAdol (talk) 11:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tigrayans

Stop adding irrelevant images to the page.Resourcer1 (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sennaitgebremariam Once again, please stop edit warring. You have no reason to remove the images.Resourcer1 (talk) 23:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Tigrayans

You may be blocked the next time you revert at Tigrayans unless you have previously obtained a consensus for your change on the talk page. For other options, see WP:Dispute resolution. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Tigrayans. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]