User talk:Sendator/sandbox

@Sendator: Just pinging you to let you know I moved the article to your sandbox (a place where you can work on the article without time pressure). It is a shame that you removed whole sections such as "philosophy" and "credibility". While the section headings may not be the best ever conceived, I know there is some very useful information in there so the article will be sorely lacking without it. If you want to readd some of that info as you continue your copyedit, you can always head back to the main article (I reverted your edit just so we didn't have a half-finished edit in the main article space), and swipe some bits here and there. Oh and perhaps there are some sources I missed. Don't hesistate to do some more research. If you are unsure what the section headings should be, I'm sure there are Wiki users you can ask. I just used my initiative based on the sorts of info I was getting from sources.--Coin945 (talk) 14:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Coin945: I'm continuing to edit it at the moment. I can redo those sections when I have the time. Feel free to work on the editing of the page with me as my work I have at home will get in the way of my progress. Thanks for your opinion. Edit: The things been cleaned up, but not in a way you may like. I reverted to an older edit, added a philosophy to it and updated the information a bit. The only thing that needs to be done now is to discuss the relationship with the audience. Sendator (talk) 08:01, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]