User talk:Sella rainbow/sandbox

ARTICLE EVALUATION The Article (Carabus Dufouri) lacks content, credibility and a structure. the topic is not well balanced; it docent elicit much knowledge about the Carabus Dufori. it is an incomplete short article without any background, or information about the specie of beetle. lots of information needs to be added to it to bring it up to wikipedia standards.01:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Sella rainbow (talk)

Feedback This article is appropriate for the assignment if you focus on adding information about the different behaviours this species exhibit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:D65F:FB27:6019:EA88:4B4E:3FAE (talk) 00:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TAXON

Kingdom - Animilia Phylum - Arthropoda Class - insect Order - coleoptera Family - Carabidae Genus - Carabus Specific epithet - dufourii Scientific name - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sella rainbow (talk • contribs) 04:09, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review on Carabus dufouri (Sburton17)

The lead has been well developed. Before, it was just a sentence or two, and you developed a well-structured paragraph for the lead. The beginning of sentences throughout the lead paragraph needs to be capitalized. For the headings of each section be sure to use the same format that is traditionally used in Wikipedia articles. In your lead paragraph consider adding some information that will give an idea of the sections to follow. When explaining the morphology, I think smaller headings for each part (abdomen, thorax, head) would improve the organizational portion of it. Throughout each description more references are needed, remember to add a reference for every fact you include to avoid plagiarism. In the following section, the first sentence is unclear, possibly because of the sentence structure. Remember to capitalize the beginning of sentences and review for spelling. All of the information provided is relevant to the topic, and well-done on the volume of information added. Your references that include a DOI are easily accessible, but the ones that do not seem to be difficult. Maybe try finding the appropriate DOI for each. Also, a couple of your articles came up in french. The content added is unbiased and neutral. Overall, the information is fantastic, well-done with your contribution. I think you need to add more content on the behavior of the species, as the last section is all that you have on behavior. The area that needs work is the organizational aspect, in terms of punctuation and headings. Give it another read over and fix any spelling and punctuation that was missed the first time around. Be sure to add all the citations necessary. Well-done and good luck with your final draft.