User talk:Seljuk Soldier

Welcome!

Hello, Seljuk Soldier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

As to the Islamic society, please read WP:N and tell me why you think it's notable enough for inclusion. - crz crztalk 09:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Moores University Islamic Society

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article John Moores University Islamic Society, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:John Moores University Islamic Society. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. - crz crztalk 09:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I have restored it to a redirect. Why not create a paragraph in the University page? Student organizations are rarely notable enough to rate their own articles. User:Zoe|(talk) 09:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And no, advertising your organization is not a good reason for inclusion. This is an encyclopedia, not free ad space. - crz crztalk 09:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this revert war and explain why you can't include this information in the University's page. User:Zoe|(talk) 09:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell you what. You remove the redirect again, and I will nominate the article for deletion. How does that sound? User:Zoe|(talk) 09:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:LJMU-ISOC Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LJMU-ISOC Logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:JMUfinallogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JMUfinallogo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - crz crztalk 14:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LivISOC

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 22:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not blank deletion discussions or persistently recreated deleted content. If you do so further you may be blocked from editing. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 08:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ISOC (Islamic Society)

An editor has nominated ISOC (Islamic Society), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISOC (Islamic Society) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 15:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with ISOC (Islamic Society). The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Agent 86 23:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LivISOC.jpeg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:LivISOC.jpeg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Banyan Tree 01:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by repeatedly recreating deleted content despite warnings. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Blocked for 24hrs. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 08:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to ISOC (Islamic Society) - your own article

{{blank]} Ronbo76 06:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated removals of AfD template from ISOC (Islamic Society)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with ISOC (Islamic Society), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Unspecified source for Image:FOSIS.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:FOSIS.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sandstein 08:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FOSIS.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FOSIS.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sandstein 08:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by repeatedly recreating deleted content and removing deletion discussion messages despite warnings. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Blocked for 48hrs. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 09:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]