Jump to content

User talk:Seifist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to James Marsden, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 23:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]
Hello Seifist, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Seifist, good luck, and have fun.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Seifist, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The source is the James_Marsden given for this edit is this edit is rottentomatoes.com and Wetpaint.com These sources are clearly did not appear WP:RS particularly when adding negative information that a movie flopped in a WP:BLP hence reverted you to another user as it had user generated content .But I leave it to you as I strictly follow 1RR in content issues.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
rottentomatoes.com and metacritic.com are used in almost every movie article on Wikipedia to determine whether a movie received largely negative reviews, mixed reviews or positive reviews. According to the Wikipeida article on Box_office_bomb a movie being unprofitable qualifies as a flop. In The_Lone_Ranger_(2013_film)#Box_office the 5 sources cited stating The Lone Ranger was a box office flop were comparable opinion pieces to the one in Wetpaint that reference sourced industry publication numbers. If you can be more specific I might be able to provide a better source. Seifist (talk)
Thanks for your response.I just explained why I had reverted you,I agree with the other user and apologize for my revert .Anyway wish you the very best and happy editing.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

[edit]
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!