User talk:Sehnazparveen

Mark Rosenzweig (Entrepreneur) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mark Rosenzweig (Entrepreneur), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 13:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sehnazparveen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I created two good articles, why you block me? I want to write in wikipedia. You do not like articles? Sehnazparveen (talk) 08:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sehnazparveen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Read the blocking policy. I will not spam, sorry that my article was spam. Please let me edit Sehnazparveen (talk) 15:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm an administrator and I haven't read all the policies so I very much doubt that you have literally read every policy on Wikipedia. I also very much doubt you happened upon these subjects by chance and without having any connection at all to them. For these reasons, I am declining your request.

To have any chance at being unblocked you must provide full disclosure about any connection you have with those you have tried to write about. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your connection to the subjects you have edited about? What topics will you edit about if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 00:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I knew in Wikipedia articles of people living now has good value. I searched in Forbes magazine for persons in whose name no article is in Wikipedia. I found Mark Rosenzweig and Miki Agarwal. I read all policies and wrote two articles. Please change the language articles but let me edit please. I like celebrities and cooking. If you please let me edit, I will follow all rules. Please guide me. I am not bad I will not spam. Please Please Please --Sehnazparveen (talk) 10:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sehnazparveen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not say you did not read rules, as yamla said me to read block policy. I said (I have) read blocking policy. I accept that I received $30 for writing two articles. I will not receive any money in future, promise. I thought the articles I wrote are good. They are famous. If they are advertising, I will consul with you in future when I publish any article. Please unblock me. I will edit in cooking and celebrity pages also. You can give me a chance. I respect you. Please do not mis understand. Please guide me. Please unblock me 331dot Sehnazparveen (talk) 18:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not inclined to believe you, given your history of lying and the limited scope of your edits. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So why did you lie to me? 331dot (talk) 23:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sehnazparveen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pardon me. I needed some money in lockdown. I lost my job. I thought you will not unblock me when I say I received money. I will not hide from you, but please unblock me. It is true, I found the two persons in Forbes Magazine. I said I can try it to the person paid me. I have read the policies now. Please help me if I have done any wrong. I will state my payment in user page and let me publish the two articles in article for creation. I have read the policy. Please tell me if the articles have any bad thing. I will remove that part. I will follow the rules. you can block me again if I do any wrong work. I have written two articles with lot work. The person paid me said he created the SharkNinja company page. He wants someone else to create a article of CEO Mark Rosenzweig. why you do not catch that person also who take money and keep silence? You only catch me? I request you. I am saying all true.I am saying all. Please see my articles. I am not spammer. Please help me to publish the articles. I will not do any bad work again. Please. 331dot I request you. Sehnazparveen (talk) 11:51 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

"How come you blocked me but not this other guy?" isn't great for an argument. I don't feel comfortable unblocking you if you plan to go back to editing the articles you're receiving money for, even if they are created in the draft space. only (talk) 20:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Miki Agrawal

Hello, Sehnazparveen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miki Agrawal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark Rosenzweig (entrepreneur)

Hello, Sehnazparveen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Rosenzweig (entrepreneur), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Rosenzweig (entrepreneur)

Hello, Sehnazparveen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark Rosenzweig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miki Agrawal

Hello, Sehnazparveen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miki Agrawal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miki Agrawal

Hello, Sehnazparveen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Miki Agrawal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]