User talk:Se killer

Ronaldo

Stop vandalising the List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers page. Ronaldo has 67, as both sources say, and as stated in the editing area. This is your second warning. Once more and I report you. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 23:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC) but Ronaldo has 68 I am sure Ronaldo haaaaaaaaas 68[reply]

Please Replay

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 14:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cristiano Ronaldo

Then provide a source for that. All the sources for that table say 67 and wikipedia relies on sources. QED237 (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the source, unfortunately that source includes qualifying rounds and Ronaldo scored a goal in third qualifying round in 2005–06 UEFA Champions League. The wikipedia list only lists tournament goals (not qualifying) just as it says and as the sources for the list says so one of the 68 goals should not be included. QED237 (talk) 15:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

How Are You !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Se wwe (talk • contribs) 14:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

I protected it because it was asked for here. Anyway you can still edit it so what is the problem? CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 15:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Borussia Dortmund

The 2008 Supercup was unofficial (as you can see here), so Dortmund has only five official Supercup wins. --Jaellee (talk) 22:29, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unofficial wins

I gave a reason for my edits in the edit summary, but I can repeat it again here: These are unofficial wins and should in my opinion not have the same emphasis as the official wins. Please give me a reason why you think they should. --Jaellee (talk) 21:55, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Constant edit warring in "El Clasico"

Hi, I've been explaining in the talk page why the changes were necessary: Barcelona has almost an unanimously support from Catalan right-wing voters, and Real Madrid fan base is bigger than Barcelona's in the biggest left party of Spain.

Catalan bourgesoise usually went to the FC Barcelona stadiums to watch their games, and many big catalan businessman have been FC Barcelona presidents.

FC Barcelona has not an "intrinsic progressive" esence, as it was founded by a not-leftist Swiss businessman, it's supported by many right-wing fans both Catalan nationalist an non-nationalist, and Its hooligan group, Boixos Nois, is bigger in number than Ultras Sur.

Boixos Nois have even killed people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cid Campeador3 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to FC Bayern Munich does not have an edit summary.Please make sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on FC Bayern Munich. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. QED237 (talk) 21:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Your recent editing history at Lionel Messi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. QED237 (talk) 16:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]