User talk:Sdgfr

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 65.93.216.56 lifted or expired. Request handled by: // Pilotguy hold short 21:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sdgfr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is so unfair. What makes you think I am a sock of that user. I only made 6 good edits. Do you people have any evidence that I am a sock? Sdgfr 11:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your contribution log shows quite clearly that you are an abusive sockpuppet. I note also that you do not deny it. — Yamla 15:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sdgfr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay fine I am a sock puppet. But it was around september 2007 since I last edited wikipedia and did not make any socks since or made any edit to wikipedia. I really want to make good edits to wikipedia this time. Now it is 2009. Sdgfr (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Why should you be unblocked? You provided me with a reason you should be blocked. — Smashville^talk 21:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sdgfr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it's been over a year now. It was september 2007 since I last created socks or vandalise wikipedia. I will only make good contributions after I am unblocked. Don't you think it is time to forgive and forget? Sdgfr (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. — Sandstein 23:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: Your proposed contribution should be very, very good. Sandstein 23:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Put it in ref tags next to the thing you wanted cited like so:

<ref>REFERENCE INFORMATION HERE</ref>. There are also some templates you can use. You can check out this for more help if you need it. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 04:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]