User talk:Sdenny123

Welcome!

Hi, Sdenny123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions - I noticed your creation of El Centinela (Signs), on which you did a fine job. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

If you are interested you may want to become involved in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church which aims specifically to improve Seventh-day Adventist related pages.

Cheers, Colin MacLaurin 18:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tortilla_Wall_1.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Tortilla_Wall_1.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Conscious 06:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit it!

Hi, I read the comment you left on Talk:Trachonitis (I've done what you suggested) and I wonder why you didn't edit it yourself? This is a useful edit and it should be done immediately without consulting others. It's not a major edit either, it's only a fix. So, be bold, and edit on! Orionist 20:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Of course you are right. I also wanted to find an intenral link to the referenced text in Luke. I figured wiki somehow had a direct way to do that but couldn't find out withing 20 clicks how, so I left it for someone more knowledgeable. Sdenny123

Image:WayneHooper-hirez.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:WayneHooper-hirez.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – Riana ^ঋ 03:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hey Sdenny123. I find it a little bizarre that the license is still allowed to be selected, and I'm not sure why. Anyway, is it possible for you to reupload the image under a more appropriate license? If you don't have it anymore, I can undelete it and you can select a better license. – Riana ^talk 14:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of John and Judas (Card Game)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on John and Judas (Card Game), by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because John and Judas (Card Game) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting John and Judas (Card Game), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bible Groups (card game). —Anas ^talk? 14:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Guide Magazine cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Guide Magazine cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hate bots. The article that used this image was renamed and the wiki is to lame to adapt to such a thing and the bot was to lame to follow the renamed link. Sdenny123 17:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seventh-day Adventist Church membership graph

Good job creating that graph. I inserted it into History of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Cheers, Colin MacLaurin 01:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seventh-day Adventist Church membership graph.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Seventh-day Adventist Church membership graph.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —dgies^t_c 22:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your version has been superseded by a SVG version with gnuplot source on commons: Image:SDA Membership.svg. —dgies^t_c 22:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Adventist hymnal 1985.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adventist hymnal 1985.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Companion SDA Hymnal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Companion SDA Hymnal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Hi Sdenny, nice work on the Seventh-day Adventist Hymnal article you just wrote. Cheers, Colin MacLaurin (talk) 03:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation link

Yep, I agree. Actually, either way is cool, don't think it matters. cheers, Tonicthebrown (talk) 11:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SDA

are you a seventh day adventist? i've noticed you have done a lot of work on sda pages so... Writergirlrocks talk 01:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

k thanks for responding sorry to bother you but i am too so i was just wondering. Writergirlrocks talk 23:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Seventh-day Adventist Church

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at [[Talk:Seventh-day Adventist Church/GA1]. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AIV report

Hello Sdenny123. I declined to take action on an AIV report where one of your edits tripped Filter 139. I suggest you contact User:Soap to see if your way of creating a map is OK. EdJohnston (talk) 04:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Review logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Review logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Wayne Hooper Arrangments volume 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wayne Hooper Arrangments volume 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please allow access to change KJRN-FM 88.3 The Journey Picture.

Hello,

I work for 88.3 The Journey and have the file to our updated logo. I would like access to change the picture to the updated logo.

Thank you!

Mattforner (talk) 02:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:KJCR-FM Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:KJCR-FM Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KBOP-LD

Just wanted to check in — do you have a source for the change of sub channel 3 from Esperanza TV to GNTV Latino? I can't find anything showing that. Mlaffs (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. You could call it original research. I am the engineer for that channel. 21:26, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keene Adventist Elementary School

The article Keene Adventist Elementary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Elementary schools are rarely notable. As there are no independent, reliable references to be found, this school doesn't appear notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Companion SDA Hymnal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Companion SDA Hymnal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vop logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vop logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I Promised God.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Promised God.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The FLAME magazine.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The FLAME magazine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Huguley logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Huguley logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:William Layton Nelson.jpg

The file File:William Layton Nelson.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bible Groups Nazareth.jpg

The file File:Bible Groups Nazareth.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TNMap-doton-Douglas Dam.png

The file File:TNMap-doton-Douglas Dam.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bible Groups John Judas.jpg

The file File:Bible Groups John Judas.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bible Groups back.jpg

The file File:Bible Groups back.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guide (Adventist magazine) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guide (Adventist magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guide (Adventist magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dronebogus (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guide (Adventist magazine) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guide (Adventist magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guide (Adventist magazine) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dronebogus (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of El Centinela (Adventist magazine) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Centinela (Adventist magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Centinela (Adventist magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 18:05, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Southwestern Union Record.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Southwestern Union Record.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Texas Conference of Seventh-day Adventists

Hello, Sdenny123, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username GeoffreyT2000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Texas Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Conference of Seventh-day Adventists.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GeoffreyT2000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bible Groups back.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bible Groups back.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of E. E. Cleveland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E. E. Cleveland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. E. Cleveland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 16:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Signs Publishing Company

The article Signs Publishing Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

When I did a Google search I could not find any reliable third-party references to prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Catfurball (talk) 23:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Signs of the Times (Australian magazine)

The article Signs of the Times (Australian magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

When I did a Google search I could not find any third-party references to prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Catfurball (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Signs of the Times (magazine)

The article Signs of the Times (magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

When I did a Google search I could not find any reliable third-party references to prove notability of magazine, also the name is way to common.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Catfurball (talk) 16:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]