User talk:Scskowron

Sear Bliss in Black metal article

Hungarian Sear Bliss deserves to be mentioned amongst succesful Eastern European black metal outfits. Please bring them back to the article. --Aranyos (talk) 18:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saintpetermarianseal.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Saintpetermarianseal.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CrossFit Article

For some reason, CrossFit seems to arouse passionate feelings and edit wars. in the past, administrators have had to become involved. Let's hope we can avoid another flare up in the edit wars that suck up hundreds of hours in wasted time and cause much exasperation. The Crossfit article that existed before your edits was the result of many months of work by many people. It conformed to Wikipedia standards and practices of a "neutral point of view" and had received a high rating from independent judges.

Some of your changes are helpful (eg. deleting dated reference to CrossFit commandos.) I'm sure your inentions are sincere and honorable, but I think some of your changes violate NPOV standards by deleting negative information and substituting less important information. (eg. named workouts).

I would be happy to go through these one by one.

The best way to proceed would be for you to restore the article as it existed before your changes -- and then discuss each proposed change on the talk page.

Please do so.

Orphaned non-free image File:Saintpetermarianseal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saintpetermarianseal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Scskowron. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]