User talk:Scrooke
G'day!
[edit]Hello Scrooke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipediroos include:
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Knife identification
- Manual of Style
As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! Mattinbgn\talk 12:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Re: Distances
[edit]I wouldn't use Google Maps for distances in articles unless I really had too since it's only a guide and not always correct. It's best to source distances from more reliable sources which infact state that distance but only use Google Maps when you can't find a distance for a location (which I think would be rare). Bidgee (talk) 07:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Canberra
[edit]Hi,
based on your editing, you may wish to join up to Wikipedia:WikiProject Canberra. Take a look and see what you think! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Orange Climate
[edit]Hi! I have replied to your posts on my talk page, basically to say that I agree: I don't think that the Australian Bureau of Meteorology data is always presented in the most satisfactory or least complicated way possible. Ondewelle (talk) 21:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2009 vic bushfires death toll
[edit]Hi, yeah I was aware of that, but many sources claimed 210 even before that resident died in hospital, a strange anomaly. I wouldn't call Victoria Police a bureaucratic entity, I'm willing to wait until they confirm or deny such assertions. Nick carson (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nah that's alright, I'll raise the issue on the talk page to prevent any edit wars. Nick carson (talk) 10:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Agreed. The royal comission and the BoM and the CSIRO and all those mobs are currently preparing such reports which will be big sources of factual complete information for us on these interrelated events.
I'm not sure the use of the term proximal cause is as clear cut as a term could be, I reckon something more like ...X & Y & Z & the heatwave, contributed to the conditions experienced on the 7th of February that led to the Kinglake Complex Firestorm etc. Nick carson (talk) 07:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Invite
[edit]You may be interested to come to the Wikipedia celebration on 15 January in Canberra. see http://twiki.riteme.site/wiki/Canberra . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dubai International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- web|url=http://travel.theemiratesnetwork.com/airports/dubai.php |title=Dubai International Airport [DXB/OMDB] – TEN Travel & Tourism [UAE] |publisher=Travel.theemiratesnetwork.com |accessdate=16 July 2009}}</ref>
- Dubai Airport launches Executive Flights Centre at Dubai International Airport. | Management > Personal & Business Support Services from |publisher=AllBusiness.com |date=19 November 2008 |
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Scrooke. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2019
[edit] Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Lisa Nowak, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. TJRC (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for December 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of female spacefarers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FAI. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)