User talk:Scromett

Welcome!

Hello, Scromett, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 22:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page merge?

Not being an expert in Civil War matters, I wanted to ask you if you think the page you created 56th Illinois Volunteer Infantry Regiment should be merged with 56th Illinois Infantry. Are they the same unit? I will take care of the details of collapsing "56th Illinois Infantry" into your page if you don't want to do so. Thank you for your time. Respectfully submitted,

Pen of bushido (talk) 20:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parent cats

The category Category:Minnesota in the Civil War is a parent cat for Category:Minnesota Civil War regiments. As such, per Wikipedia guidelines, the parent cat is typically not referenced alongside the subcat. Feel free, by the way, to join the Civil War task force, we woul love to have you on board! Scott Mingus 15:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I look forward to working with you all. Scromett 19:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin regiment articles

Thanks for contributing these articles! I made several minor stylistic and spelling changes per the guidelines we use for the American Civil War Task Force (see 2nd Wisconsin Volunteer Infantry Regiment). For example, only the first word in titles is capitalized (Total enlistments and casualties). Also note that enlistments is not spelled enlistements. The year in full dates has a trailing comma (December 25, 1865, to January 30, 1865, for your lists of colonels and their command dates. Also, references should be delineated with <re> and </ref> commands and later placed in a Notes section. Please adjust your current articles and future ones using this style. Also, please check out User:Hlj/CWediting for ideas. Keep those articles coming! Thanks on behalf of the ACW Task Force! Scott Mingus 17:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vistulan Legion

The article has a chance of being DYKed if you address this comment.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 03:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Battery "K" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Battery "K" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery, by Tdmg (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Battery "K" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Battery "K" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Battery "K" 1st Regiment Michigan Light Artillery itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military History

I see that you like military history a lot with the creation of so many articles on the Illinois civil war regiments. I was wondering if you would be able to assist us in expanding Battle of Stillman's Run to eventual GA status. If you aren't interested, that is ok, but I just figured I would ask! Thanks, I appreciate your time.--Kranar drogin 19:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the "battery" link

Hi, and thanks for your work on the artillery battery articles.

I have a request. When you want to link to the meaning for "battery", please use [[Artillery battery|battery]] instead using [[battery]]. When you use the plain form, you link to a disambiguation page that is not useful to your reader. I have been cleaning up links to the plain form from many different kinds of articles, not just yours, which is how I happened to see your articles.The electricity guys tend to be the biggest offenders, but we also get a fair number of criminal battery types also.

Thanks. -Arch dude 00:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just changed about 16 articles that had [[artillery]] [[battery]] in them. They now have [[artillery battery]] instead. I hope this is acceptable. -Arch dude 01:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent catch! I will fix my template to correct this in the future. I'm having a duh! moment. Scromett 12:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pennsylvania Civil War Units

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I already created a similar article (List of Pennsylvania Civil War regiments) to the one you recently created. Wild Wolf 18:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

11th New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment

11th New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment is up for peer review here. Your comments are appreciated. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 17:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Scromett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vermont Units In the Civil War

The article Vermont Units In the Civil War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate topic of List of Vermont Civil War units - although slightly older than its counterpart, this page is nearly an orphan and is more poorly categorized, in addition to the non-MoS-compliant title

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ganesha811 (talk) 22:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]