User talk:Scribbley

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome Scribbley (talk) 04:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia. I will kindly remind you to only upload images that are 100% free of copyright. Unless you took the image yourself, or the image has been released under an open (GFDL, GNU, or Creative Common) license, please do not upload it to Wikipedia or Commons. A non-free image can be used, so long as it is irreplaceable and serves a specific purpose. This means an image of Athlete is generally considered replaceable as long as they are alive. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 20:17, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, I'll take that info into my further decisions as I learn more about this website, thanks! Scribbley (talk) 21:34, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when it comes to infobox images it is preferred that a quality picture is shown over a recent one. In the case of J. J. Watt, a picture of him without his helmet is better than one with his helmet on. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creating other users' userpages

Hi, please do not create other users' userpages as you did at User:JesseBryce4. Use their talk pages instead. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:32, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for the response, you know a lot about Wikipedia so I'll learn from you sorry for not doing it on the talk page thanks eagles!

May 2019

Hello, I'm Eagles247. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Marshawn Lynch, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for the Barnstar! Red Director (talk) 19:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for changing the Anthony Davis page. Goldenboy55555 (talk) 23:13, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you indefinitely for socking. Although I confirmed two named accounts (both no-edit "bots"), the principal reason for this block is because of persistent, abusive editing while logged out. The number of edits you've made (with your IPs) that are disgusting vandalism is large.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those aren't mine, you tracked the wrong info I don't vandalize wiki Scribbley (talk) 03:13, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You tracked the wrong person because I don't vandalize Scribbley (talk) 03:46, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scribbley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been here since February all my reverts are minor and I don't ever vandalize bad but when I took out a current list from 1 player they blocked me indefinitely I would please ask to be unblocked I was blocked for no reason Scribbley (talk) 03:12, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Second unblock template/reasoning

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scribbley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fully understand the reasoning I was blocked, I created the 2 bot accounts because I thought anybody could create one, I was wrong, I kept them because I couldn't figure out how to delete them, for the other reasoning you claimed i fully disagree u have never vandalized wiki in the way you guys claimed, I've checked IP addresses before when checking to see if this user harmed wiki in another way and IP addresses seem to be different people because I see edit time spans range from one edit from 2009 for example then the next in 2018, I don't know how there thing came to me but I don't harm, on everything else I will fully comply with Wikipedia rules and fully agree to them thank you and have a nice day!!Scribbley (talk) 14:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I cannot unblock you at this time. As this is a checkuser block, please read and heed the pertinent sections of the WP:GAB. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I Scribbley (talk) 14:07, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To the reviewing admin, please see (redacted) for the logged-out edits referenced by the blocking admin. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:07, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagles247 and Dlohcierekim: I'd like to clarify CU policy for both of you. I am not permitted to disclose the IP(s) of named accounts. I have not done so. However, a non-CU-editor (administrator or not) may publicly state their opinion about a possible connection between IPs and a named account.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please comply with a reason, I checked the edits that eagles provided, even if those are or aren't mine they are minor and are not sickening as you claimed.They Are minor edits I want another administrator to look over them because they are minor either way and your not compelling with my understanding how can you ban on minor edits Scribbley (talk) 18:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Scribbley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25833 was submitted on Jul 07, 2019 18:20:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My last unblock request for a while

My last request for a while place

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scribbley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have looked into the whole situation and I checked the 2 devices I've only edited on that was this account or this phone and my PC don't know how you guys got that IP address which was vanadalising but it was not me I have never vandalized before on this account or my pc I had only one instance that I can remember that I vandalized but that was a while ago on my old phone and I regret it I know some of my edits get reverted i don't know if that has anything to do with this but I'm truly sorry if I get unblocked I want to add info boxes and fix grammar and I just want to help wiki again I understand what you guys banned me for I hope this explanation really helped you guys I just want to move forward and continue helping Wikipedia thank you, Scribbley (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're clearly vandalizing while logged out. If you continue to waste our time by denying this, your talk page access will be revoked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want I can edit on my computer to prove if you want Scribbley (talk) 16:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't now if the IP linked to you is yours or not. We don't link accounts to users that way. So I really do not know what Bbb23 saw in his check user. He likely saw everything between the keyboard and the Wikipedia article. As this is a check user block, only a check user can unblock. I wish I could help and would be inclined to unblock given your past history. Please see the WP:GAB sections that pertain. Sorry, i cannot unblock you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've been logging out to vandalize and logging back in to undo the vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 23:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]