User talk:Scott Shelby
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Scott Shelby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 01:46, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Democratic Party
[edit]There's no deadline. There are two books I found interesting in understanding U.S. ideology: Louis Hartz' The LIberal Tradition in America and Martin Seymour Lipset's American Exceptionalism. TFD (talk) 01:46, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'll be sure to read them when I have time, and I have already found a copy of Louis Hartz's Liberal Tradition in America on Google Books as a matter of fact. I am surprised this type of literature is publicly available on the internet, especially since the vast majority of literature is usually monetized.
EDIT: On second thought, I did uncover bias regarding Hartz and Lipset, since both of them were staunch proponents of American exceptionalism (Which frequently manifests itself in rightwing circles) and Lipset was an outright neoconservative, largely following the rightwing Bushian approach to foreign policy, which is a controversial approach at best and ludicrous at worst. I may still read them, but they don't seem to be fully reliable judging by their general rightwing slant. Scott Shelby (talk) 01:56, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- While the Right uses the term American exceptionalism to refer to Americanism, that is not what Hartz or Lipset meant. Lipset is often associated with neo-conservatism because he had been a member of the Socialist Party, but following its demise never commented on partisan politics. By the time George W. Bush became president, he had stopped writing. I don't know what Hartz' politics were. I think they were both more interested in history and political theory than contemporary politics. TFD (talk) 06:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
August 2019
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Huey Long shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)