User talk:Scott2357

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mecca, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Entranced98 (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Sandbox. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits such as this are completely unacceptable per Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Collaborative editing is essential to improving articles, and this type of edit does nothing at all to foster that. You have been warned before for other unconstructive edits, so any further violation will be evidence that you are here for reasons other than building an encyclopedia and a request will be made to have your account indefinitely blocked from editing by an administrator at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Samsara 23:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scott2357 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was logged in on a shared computer so I was unaware of this edit being made, I shall log out of the account on the shared computer. I am aware of the edits that were made and I apologise profusely for what has happened. Thank you and I hope to be unblocked :) Scott2357 (talk) 14:04, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sounds like you are claiming you didn't make the edit in question, that your account was compromised. As per WP:COMPROMISED, this account is no longer eligible for unblock consideration. Yamla (talk) 14:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Scott2357 (talk) 14:04, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scott2357 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since the blocking, I have matured and can see the unnecessary damage I was causing, being young quite evidently ignorance was bliss but I certainly see that Scott2357 in the past was trying to be a joker and hopping onto online trends, but would love to welcomed back to Wikipedia with open arms if at all possible. Scott2357 (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since this account was compromised, it cannot be unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 06:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.