User talk:Scott19982

Montello

The |line= parameter in {{infobox station}} is to specify the physical railway line - in this case, the Fall River Railroad - and not the service (MBTA Commuter Rail, South Coast Rail, etc). Please stop adding the South Coast Rail templates everywhere. South Coast Rail is a proposed project (and one that's been proposed since the 1980s with zero actual results), and all signs point to the two-phase proposal being a political disaster that's going exactly nowhere. There's not a lot of need to preemptively add claims about it when it's a decade or more out for many stations.

I would like to apologize on one thing - you were correct about the 2022/2030 schedule. However, you needed to provide a reliable source to back that up; without the source, it looked like you were just adding random numbers. Verifiability of all claims is an extremely important part of Wikipedia; it what makes us a useful reference source and not just a rumor mill. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making the same change to Bridgewater. I am very frustrated with your refusal to listen to what I am saying - it is exceptionally rude, especially since you cannot even be bother to add an edit summary to explain what you are doing. The line parameter is NOT for the service (Middleborough/Lakeville Line, South Coast Rail, etc). It is for the physical railroad line, which is not the same thing. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries.

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Morphenniel (talk) 09:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits that lack citations and cannot be verified

Please stop making changes to Wikipedia that cannot be verified. WP:VERIFY

As, example:
https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=South_Chatham_Railroad_Station&type=revision&diff=790003282&oldid=789929867
https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wellfleet_Railroad_Station&diff=prev&oldid=790003074
https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Orleans_Train_Station&diff=prev&oldid=790002504

You are wasting the time of many editors on Wikipedia who must spend extra time reviewing and often reverting the changes that you are making. Please have a look at WP:ORIGINAL and WP:REF.
Information that you add to an article needs to be supported with one of more citations.FFM784 (talk) 13:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sock Puppet Investigation

You have been reported [1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morphenniel (talk • contribs) 09:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scott19982. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 19:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Improper use of line parameter and lack of edit summaries

This is your final warning before I ask for you to be blocked. Two of your editing habits are unacceptable, cause disruption, and must change. As multiple users have explained to you over and over, the "line" parameter is for the physical railway line, not the named service. Yet you persist in removing the physical line name and adding the service. Why have you ignored what people have explained to you?

In the same vein, why do you refuse to leave edit summaries? If you cannot be bothered to explain what your edit is, it casts doubt on what you are trying to do. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:37, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clicquot railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Clicquot railway station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 03:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Random Edits

I have noticed you often make small, incorrect and unverified edits to many MBTA-related pages, which causes people to have to go back and fix them. Please stop editing without verified sources and use proper grammar. Adding an edit summary to edits would be nice, too. Anthonyt31201 (talk) 00:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: SCR

Template editing is not my cup of tea I'm afraid. Mitch32^{(The many fail: the one succeeds.)} 05:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

South Coast Rail

Again, South Coast Rail and it's stations is PLANNED. Construction has not commenced. You repeatedly change this in articles, and it is annoying. Your lack of edit summaries, poor grammar and unsourced edits make the South Coast Rail articles look like a mess. Anthonyt31201 (talk) 00:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 06:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there I'm new to Wikipedia and I noticed that Pi.1415926535 have made some.horrible edits and something should be done about it thank you for your time Infiniti0571 (talk) 03:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Scott19982 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19256 was submitted on Sep 17, 2017 04:26:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Scott19982 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19258 was submitted on Sep 17, 2017 15:49:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Scott19982 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19259 was submitted on Sep 17, 2017 16:49:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is bullshit Scott19982 (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do anything all I was doing was fixing bad edits but I'm the one who gets blocked really Scott19982 (talk) 18:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the user that makes bad edits Pi.1415926535 not me and I don't know who infiniti0517 is I'm really getting sick of users that can do anything they want as of I get treated by Pi.1415926535 I'm getting ready to delete my account Scott19982 (talk) 18:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why I'm being blocked for sockpuppity I don't know who infiniti0517 is Scott19982 (talk) 23:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't deserve to be blocked Pi.1415926535 definitely deserve to be blocked Scott19982 (talk) 23:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your responses to this block clearly demonstrates that you are un-suitable for editing Wikipedia. Morphenniel (talk) 11:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really why is that I didn't do anything wrong or maybe your the same person that is Pi.1415926535 under a different user name Scott19982 (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pi.1415926535 doesn't deserve to be blocked; he did nothing wrong. Anthonyt31201 (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes he did he keeps making bad edits Scott19982 (talk) 03:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, YOU made bad edits. You never cited sources, engaged in edit wars, used bad grammar, never put an edit summary, and used multiple other accounts. All Pi.1415926535 did was constantly revert your poor edits which upset you. Don't try to blame your ban on somebody else; you clearly shouldn't be editing on Wikipedia. Anthonyt31201 (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, all and any attempt to edit using a new user would be considered sock-puppetry, and we have already identified one suspect. Morphenniel (talk)

Can someone please help me with deleting this account please tell me the steps to do so I'm trying to start new with my new account and this account has a bad name because of me and doing bad edits I'm very sorry for that Scott19982 (talk) 17:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are banned; you can't just make a new account and then start editing again. Anthonyt31201 (talk) 02:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's your problem Anthony31201 I'm trying to delete this account and to start over new Scott19982 (talk) 03:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone help me on deleting this account please tell me how to do it if someone can delete a account on wikipedia? Scott19982 (talk) 03:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just start over. You are permanently banned; you aren't allowed to edit here anymore. Even if you have a new account. Anthonyt31201 (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following a discussion with Scott19982 on the #wikipedia-en-unblock channel I will unblock his sockpuppet User:P0404. See User talk:P0404 for details. Huon (talk) 23:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much huon I promise it will never happen again P0404 (talk) 23:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-blocked P0404 after the promise was contradicted by the subsequent edits. Huon (talk) 06:33, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

editing and looking for proof I know I've seen it I was going to but a edit summary like I did on my profile but I have to ask does Pi.1415926535 have Senoraty over other editors? Scott19982 (talk) 16:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have been doing what I've told you that I would but it's ok that Pi.1415926535 can put things on a page from 1846 even though it's not that anymore it's the Middleborough main line from 1846 to me that don't make any sense Scott19982 (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I mean huon really now this is what I feel like Scott19982 (talk) 05:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not only are you making no sense at all, you are constantly blaming Pi.1415926535 for no reason. It's the Middleborough Main line, by the way. That parameter is for the physical train tracks that are being run on. The Middleborough/Lakeville line is the service run by the MBTA. You have been told that countless times; you clearly shouldn't be editing here if you can't understand that. Anthonyt31201 (talk) 03:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Clicquot railway station concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Clicquot railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Clicquot railway station

Hello, Scott19982. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clicquot railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Blackstone (NYNH&H station)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Blackstone (NYNH&H station), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is a draft which has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 08:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]