User talk:Scotsman in New Zealand

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hosea Gear has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hosea Gear was changed by Scotsman in New Zealand (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864868 on 2015-09-07T03:44:21+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 07:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ngāti Kahungunu, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ngāti Kahungunu was changed by Scotsman in New Zealand (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952505 on 2015-09-07T11:39:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Balclutha, New Zealand.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Balclutha, New Zealand was changed by Scotsman in New Zealand (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950259 on 2015-09-07T11:44:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scotsman in New Zealand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't even Vandalising i just having fun can be unblocked. Scotsman in New Zealand (talk) 23:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you're not able to discern the difference between the two, then unblocking you would be a poor idea. Kuru (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scotsman in New Zealand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't vandalism on articles i will make good articles one day. Scotsman in New Zealand (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scotsman in New Zealand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't abused Multiplie Accounts because i told i don't Vandalise because other accounts is not related to other accounts that lives somewhere else could you unblock me because i won't Vandalise and make good contributions to Wikipedia one day. Scotsman in New Zealand (talk) 01:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the vandalism, sockpuppettry, and your apparent lack of the ability to form a coherent English sentence, there is no good reason to unblock you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.