User talk:ScienceMan123

ScienceMan123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ScienceMan123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi ScienceMan123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ScienceMan123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Century Initiative, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern DoubleGrazing, I have no connections to or conflict of interest with the Century Initiative. ScienceMan123 (talk) 12:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Century Initiative. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Stop it, both of you. You need to discuss this on the talkpage. If you can't stop, then I will request that the page be protected. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 14:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, the other user appears intent on whitewashing the article by removing relevant published and properly cited content. I will request assistance on the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard and submit the article for dispute resolution. ScienceMan123 (talk) 23:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Mako001

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Century Initiative § Discussion of neutrality in article. Can you please participate in this discussion? It needs both of you there. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 15:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll be there. ScienceMan123 (talk) 23:24, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bensimon Byrne

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bensimon Byrne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bensimon Byrne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bensimon Byrne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bensimon Byrne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Canadian Parliament infiltration plot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kennedy Stewart. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bensimon Byrne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bensimon Byrne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bensimon Byrne (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DreamlarT (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Johnston (Canadian businesswoman) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alex Johnston (Canadian businesswoman), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Was this the culmination of an AfD process that I missed? ScienceMan123 (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Johnston (Canadian businesswoman) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alex Johnston (Canadian businesswoman), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Johnston (Canadian businesswoman) has been accepted

Alex Johnston (Canadian businesswoman), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Chinese government interference in Canada

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chinese government interference in Canada, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of Chinese interference in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections

I noticed that you undid a few changes I made whilst cleaning up a disruptive edit earlier, so I wanted to explain myself instead of just directly reverting you.

Uyghur Human Rights Project is not a correct reference; that is an American organization. As referenced in the article, "Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project" is the correct Canadian organization, which unfortunately does not have a wiki article of its own to link to.
I dated the {{More citations needed section}} tag to March because that's when the section was created, along with the HTML comment saying more citations were needed. I just thought a proper template was needed there, dated to when the comment was added, instead of just the comment.

— Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 02:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

₪ MIESIANIACAL 20:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ScienceMan123, this process is voluntary. You don't need to participate, but I would encourage you to do so.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 02:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification, I will participate. ScienceMan123 (talk) 00:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Allegations of Chinese government interference in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Allegations of Chinese government interference in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]